SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 620

G. JAYACHANDRAN
Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
State by The Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M.R. Jothimanian, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Krishore Kumar, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side).

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant herein in S.C.No.89 of 2017, by judgment dated 26.11.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District and acquit the appellant herein from all charges.)

1. The appellant herein is the sole accused in S.C.No.89 of 2017 on the file of Fast Track Mahila Court at Dharmapuri. He was tried for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 376 IPC and Section 4 r/w 3 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 and found guilty of the charges and sentenced to undergo one year SI for the offence under Section 341 of IPC; and to undergo one year SI for the offence under Section 323 of IPC; and to undergo two years RI for the offence under Section 354 of IPC; and to undergo 10 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- i/d to undergo one year RI for the offence under Section 376 of IPC; and to undergo three years RI and to pay fine of Rs.25,000/- i/d to undergo Six mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top