M. SUNDAR, N. ANAND VENKATESH
Mano @ Manokaran – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the entire records of the 2nd respondent in his proceeding vide No.101/BCDFGISSSV/2022 dated 17.08.2022 to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to produce the detenu Prabhakaran @ Prabha, male, aged 29 years, son of Sankar, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal and set him at liberty forthwith.)
M. Sundar, J.
1. Captioned ''Habeas Corpus Petition'' [''HCP'' for the sake of brevity] has been filed by brother of detenu assailing a ''preventive detention order dated 17.08.2022 bearing reference 101/BCDFGISSSV/2022'' [hereinafter ''impugned detention order'' for the sake of convenience and brevity]. To be noted, fourth respondent is the sponsoring authority and second respondent is the detaining authority as impugned detention order has been made by second respondent.
2. Impugned detention order has been made under ''The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber law offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral traffic offenders, Sand-offenders, Sexual-offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirat
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an unexplained delay in making a preventive detention order can lead to the snapping of the 'live and proximate link' between the grounds of d....
The 'live and proximate link' between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention must be examined, and unexplained delay in making a preventive detention order renders it unacceptable.
Unexplained delay in making a preventive detention order can lead to a lack of a live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention, rendering the detention order i....
The unexplained delay in the live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is a valid point of examination in preventive detention cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention, and the categorization of unexplained d....
The unexplained delay between the date of remand in the ground case and the date of the impugned detention order led to the snapping of the 'live and proximate link' between the grounds of detention ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention, with a focus on examining unreasonable....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a live and proximate link between the grounds of preventive detention and the purpose of detention, emphasizing the importance o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unexplained delay in the collection of materials for a preventive detention order can render the detention invalid, and that preventive detent....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention in preventive detention cases, with a fo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.