BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R. MAHADEVAN, J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, JJ.
S. Dharmar - Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited - Respondent
W.P.(MD) No. 22021 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD) Nos. 16180, 16181 & 16182 of 2022
Decided On : 28-09-2022
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Debts Recovery - Issuance of a Writ of Certiorari - Quash - Discharge his liabilities - Transfer by way of lease - Whether any of the measures referred to in sub-section (4) of Section 13 taken by secured creditor for enforcement of security are in accordance with provisions of this Act and rules made - Held, Secured creditor can file an application before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate within whose jurisdiction secured asset or other documents relating thereto are found for taking possession thereof - If any such request is made Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate as case may be, is obliged to take possession of asset or document and forward the same to secured creditor - It follows that a secured creditor may in order to enforce his rights - Writ Petition is disposed of.
ORDER :
R. Mahadevan, J.
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 05.04.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.217 of 2022 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District and quash the same.
The prayer made in this Writ Petition is to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the order dated 05.04.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.217 of 2022 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District.
2. Though there is availability of expeditious and effective remedies under the SARFAESI Act, this writ petition has been filed, since the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not functional.
3. Before going into the issue raised in this writ petition, we deem it fit to consider the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act and the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as this Court in this regard, which will make one understand about the enforcement of security interest by the Banks or financial institutions in case of default in repayment of secured debt, vice versa the rights of the borrower against such enforcement.
4. Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act''), which deals with enforcement of security interest, states that notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 69 or 69A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the court's intervention, by such creditor in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
5. Section 13(2) of the Act provides that when a borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor, makes any default in repayment of secured debt, and his account in respect of such debt is classified as nonperforming asset, then the secured creditor may require the borrower, by notice in writing, to discharge his liabilities within sixty days from the date of the notice, failing which the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights given in Section 13(4) of the Act.
6. Section 13(3) of the Act provides that the notice under Section 13(2) of the Act shall give details of the amount payable by the borrower as also the details of the secured assets intended to be enforced by the bank. Section 13(3-A) of the Act was inserted by Act 30 of 2004 after the decision of this Court in Mardia Chemicals vs. Union of India reported in (2004) 4 SCC 311 and provides for a last opportunity for the borrower to make a representation to the secured creditor against the classification of his account as a non-performing asset. The secured creditor is required to consider the representation of the borrowers, and if the secured creditor comes to the conclusion that the representation is not tenable or acceptable, then he must communicate, within one week of the receipt of the communication by the borrower, the reasons for rejecting the same.
7. Section 13(4) of the Act provides that if the borrower fails to discharge his liability within the period specified in Section 13(2), then the secured creditor, may take recourse to any of the following actions, to recover his debt, namely-
(b) take over the management of the business of the borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset:
Provided that the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale shall be exercised only where the substantial part of the business of the borrower is held as security for the debt:
Provided further that where the management of whole, of the business or part of the business is severable, the secured creditor shall take over the management of such business of the borrower which is relata
Mardia Chemicals vs. Union of India
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra
Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai
SBI v. Allied Chemical Laboratories
ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Umakanta Mohapatra
State Bank of Travancore v. Mathew K.C.
Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
Agarwal Tracom (P) Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank
United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon
Hindon Forge (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act, the availability of expeditious and effective remedies, and the non-maintainab....
The SARFAESI Act provides for the enforcement of security interest by secured creditors and the availability of alternative statutory remedies, emphasizing the non-maintainability of writ petitions a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the non-maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 against proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, and the requirement for the petitioner to ....
The SARFAESI Act provisions, including the enforcement of security interest, the rights of the borrower, the appeal process, and the non-maintainability of writ petitions against private financial in....
Exhaustion of alternative remedies before approaching the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, as emphasized by the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and supported by relevant Supreme Court....
Writ petitions under Article 226 not maintainable against private scheduled banks' SARFAESI actions; borrowers must exhaust Section 17 remedy before Debts Recovery Tribunal; High Courts cannot direct....
Powers of High Court under Article 226 cannot be invoked in matter of recovery of dues under Act, unless there is any statutory violation resulting in prejudice to party or where such proceedings or ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.