IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS, (MADURAI BENCH)
R. MAHADEVAN, J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, JJ.
K. Subramanian and Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
State Bank of India and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.10357 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD) No.7355 of 2022
Decided On : 24-11-2022
SARFAESI Act - Enforcement of Security Interest - Section 13, Section 14, Section 17, Section 18 - The court discussed the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act, including the enforcement of security interest, the rights of the borrower, the appeal process, and the non-maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition challenges the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, ordering to take possession of the secured asset and the direction to extend the one time settlement scheme to the petitioners. The petitioners seek relief due to the non-functionality of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted the petitioners two weeks to approach the respondent - Bank for a one time settlement proposal and directed the respondent - Bank to consider the proposal within two weeks. In case of failure, the petitioners were directed to pay the remaining outstanding amount in six consecutive equal monthly installments.
Issues: Challenge to the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, and the non-functionality of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai. Non-maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act, the availability of expeditious and effective remedies, and the non-maintainability of a writ petition against the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act.
Final Decision: The petitioners were granted two weeks to approach the respondent - Bank for a one time settlement proposal and directed to pay the remaining outstanding amount in six consecutive equal monthly installments if the proposal fails. No coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent - Bank till the specified time.
ORDER :
(R. Mahadevan, J.)
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 22.04.2022 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Crl.M.P.No.1053 of 2022, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent – Bank to extent OTS Scheme sanctioned on 25.01.2022 in SAMB/MDU/VK/512.)
Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 22.04.2022, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1053 of 2022, by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, ordering to take possession of the secured asset, with a direction to the respondent – Bank to extend the scheme of one time settlement, which was sanctioned on 25.01.2022, to the petitioners.
2. Though there is an availability of expeditious and effective remedies under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, “the SARFAESI Act”), this writ petition has been filed, since the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not functional.
3. Before going into the issue raised in this writ petition, we deem it fit to consider the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act and the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as this Court in this regard, which will make one understand about the enforcement of security interest by the Banks or financial institutions in case of default in repayment of secured debt, vice versa the rights of the borrower against such enforcement.
4. Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, which deals with enforcement of security interest, states that notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 69 or 69A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the court's intervention, by such creditor in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
5. Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that when a borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor, makes any default in repayment of secured debt, and his account in respect of such debt is classified as non-performing asset, then the secured creditor may require the borrower, by notice in writing, to discharge his liabilities within sixty days from the date of the notice, failing which the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights given in Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act.
6. Section 13(3) of the SARFAESI Act provides that the notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act shall give details of the amount payable by the borrower as also the details of the secured assets intended to be enforced by the bank. Section 13(3-A) of the SARFAESI Act was inserted by Act 30 of 2004 after the decision of this Court in Mardia Chemicals vs. Union of India reported in (2004) 4 SCC 311 and it provides for a last opportunity for the borrower to make a representation to the secured creditor against the classification of his account as a non-performing asset. The secured creditor is required to consider the representation of the borrowers, and if the secured creditor comes to the conclusion that the representation is not tenable or acceptable, then he must communicate, within one week of the receipt of the communication by the borrower, the reasons for rejecting the same.
7. Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act provides that if the borrower fails to discharge his liability within the period specified in Section 13(2), then the secured creditor, may take recourse to any of the following actions, to recover his debt, namely-
(b) take over the management of the business of the borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset:
Provided that the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale shall be exercised only where the substantial part of the busines
Mardia Chemicals vs. Union of India reported in (2004) 4 SCC 311
United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra
Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai
SBI v. Allied Chemical Laboratories
ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Umakanta Mohapatra
State Bank of Travancore v. Mathew K.C.
Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
Agarwal Tracom (P) Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank
C. Bright v. Distt. Collector [(2021) 2 SCC 392
United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon
Hindon Forge (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act, the availability of expeditious and effective remedies, and the non-maintainab....
The SARFAESI Act provides for the enforcement of security interest by secured creditors and the availability of alternative statutory remedies, emphasizing the non-maintainability of writ petitions a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the non-maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 against proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, and the requirement for the petitioner to ....
The SARFAESI Act provisions, including the enforcement of security interest, the rights of the borrower, the appeal process, and the non-maintainability of writ petitions against private financial in....
Writ petitions under Article 226 not maintainable against private scheduled banks' SARFAESI actions; borrowers must exhaust Section 17 remedy before Debts Recovery Tribunal; High Courts cannot direct....
A writ petition cannot be entertained against SARFAESI Act proceedings when an adequate statutory remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal is available.
The High Court must not entertain writ petitions regarding SARFAESI actions without the petitioner first pursuing statutory remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal as mandated under the SARFAESI ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.