IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SUBRAMANIAN, K. KUMARESH BABU, JJ.
The University Grants Commission – Appellant
Versus
Annamalai University – Respondent
W.A. No. 606 of 2015
Decided On : 20-01-2023
University Grants Commission Act 1956 – Section 26 – Annamalai University Act, 2013 – Annamalai University Act, 1929 –University Grants Commission Act – Section 3 – Writ petition was filed by Annamalai University, 1st respondent in writ appeal challenging order of University Grants Commission, in so far as it relates to condition under clause B(8) of said order as illegal, irrational and without jurisdiction – Held, Court conclude that University Grants Commission Regulations will prevail in view of primacy given to University Grants Commission under University Grants Commission Act as well as Entry 66 of List 1 of 7th Schedule of Constitution – While Universities established by State enactment and other private Universities can enrol students from outside State, their other activities viz. establishment of learner support centres, conduct of examination etc. must be within State only – Insofar as deemed to be universities are concerned, they can conduct online distance education programmes in compliance with Regulations of University Grants Commission upon having recognition from University Grants Commission – Writ petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Prayer in W.A. No. 606 of 2015: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P. No. 30039 of 2012 dated 12.03.2013.
1. W.A. No. 606 of 2015 is an appeal by the University Grants Commission challenging the order of the writ Court in W.P. No. 30039 of 2012 dated 12.03.2013.
2. The said writ petition was filed by Annamalai University, the 1st respondent in the writ appeal challenging the order of the University Grants Commission dated 21.08.2012, in so far as it relates to the condition under clause B(8) of the said order as illegal, irrational and without jurisdiction.
3. Under the said communication dated 21.08.2012, while recognising the distance education programmes offered by Annamalai University, the University Grants Commission had imposed a condition to the effect that the territorial jurisdiction for offering programmes through distance mode will be as per the decision of the Council taken in its 40th Distance Education Council (DEC) meeting. The said decision was to the effect that the territorial jurisdiction of the State Universities (both the Government funded and private) will be as per their Acts and Statutes, but not beyond the boundaries of their respective states. In order to give effect to the above decision, the same was put in a form of condition for recognition and clause B(8) which incorporates the said condition reads as follows:
4. Aggrieved by the restriction of its area of operation, Annamalai University challenged the same in the said writ petition. The writ Court by its order dated 12.03.2013 upheld the challenge and quashed the said clause alone. There was a further mandamus restraining the University Grants Commission from interfering with the right of the University to conduct various distant education programmes without any territorial limits. Aggrieved the University Grants Commission is before us by way of this intra-Court appeal.
5. W.P. No. 27185 of 2015 has been filed by Annamalai University challenging the proceedings of the Distance Education Bureau of the University Grants Commission dated 28.07.2015/14.08.2015 requiring the University not to admit any student for Open Distant Learning (ODL) programmes during the Academic Year 2015-16.
6. W.P. No. 34428 of 2015 has been filed by Periyar University challenging the letter written by the 2nd respondent viz. Distance Education Bureau of University Grants Commission not to admit any student for Open Distant Learning (ODL) programmes during the Academic Year 2015-16 on the ground that it has violated the territorial jurisdiction policy.
7. W.P. No. 39602 of 2015 has been filed by the Bharathidasan University challenging the similar direction issued by the Distance Education Bureau of the University Grants Commission dated 22.07.2015 requiring the University not to admit any student under the Distant Education programme, since the University is guilty of violation of the territorial jurisdiction guidelines.
8. W.P. (MD) No. 10992 of 2015 has been filed by a private University Ponnnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Science and Technology, declared as a deemed to be University under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, seeking a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider its proposal for continuance of the University Centre for Distant Education Programmes.
9. W.P. No. 2750 of 2016 has been filed by the University of Madra
Point of Law : The powers under Article 142(1) to do complete justice is entirely of different level or of a different quality. Any prohibition or restriction contained in ordinary laws cannot act as....
The recognition of degrees obtained through distance learning from universities with off-campus study centers beyond territorial jurisdiction is subject to the UGC's regulations and public notices.
The Chancellor's authority to annul off-campus centres without Government sanction is upheld, affirming that the syndicate's recommendations must comply with statutory requirements.
Deemed universities must comply with UGC guidelines for distance education; degrees awarded without prior approval are invalid.
Singhania University was established under a Statute and automatically recognized. It needed no recognition by any other authority and hence the prayers of the Petitioners were granted.
Off-campus study centers require prior approval of the UGC and the State Government, and appointments made contrary to this requirement are liable to be canceled.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.