IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
M. Parvin – Petitioner
Versus
The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption – Respondent
Crl. O.P. Nos. 30357, 31323 of 2019, Crl. R.C. Nos. 147, 527 of 2020, Crl. M.P. Nos. 16426, 17085, 17088 of 2019, 1047, 1049, 4170, 4171 of 2020
Decided On : 11-11-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 109, 120, 409 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482, 397, 401 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13 - Inherent powers of the High Court - Offence punishable with imprisonment - Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for entire records learned Additional Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected Member of Parliament Members of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu quash same in so far petitioner is concerned - Held, Court finds that there are sufficient ground for proceeding against are materials against question of quashing case does not arise circumstances emerging from record of case indicated involvement of accused persons in alleged offence - Considering fact trial where offences conducted - Court is not inclined to quash proceedings trial Court uninfluenced with orders of proceed with trial merits and in accordance with law - Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
ORDER :
Prayer in CRL.O.P.No. 30357 of 2019: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings in C.C.No. 14/2019 pending on the files of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly, Chennai and quash the same as against the petitioner.
Prayer in CRL.O.P.No. 31323 of 2019: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records in C.C.No. 14 of 2019 on the file of the learned Additional Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected Member of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu, Singaravelar Maaligai, Chennai and quash the same in so far the petitioner is concerned.
Prayer in CRL.R.C.No. 147 of 2020: Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed by the Additional Special Court for Cases Related to Elected Members of Parliament and Member of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 001 in Crl.M.P.No. 17829 of 2019 in C.C.No. 14 of 2019.
Prayer in CRL.R.C.No. 527 of 2020: Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by the Additional Special Court for Trial of Cases related to Elected Members of Parliament and Member of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No. 20625 of 2019 in C.C.No. 14 of 2019.
1. CRL.O.P.Nos.30357 & 31323 of 2019 have been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 14 of 2019, pending on the file of the Additional Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly, Chennai/trial Court in so far as the petitioners/A2 & A6 are concerned.
2. CRL.R.C.Nos.147 & 527 of 2020 have been filed by the petitioners/A4 & A5 to set aside the order, dated 20.12.2019, made in Crl.M.P.Nos.17829 & 20625 of 2019 in C.C.No. 14 of 2019 by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Additional Special Court for Cases Related to Elected Members of Parliament and Member of Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu, Chennai/trial Court.
3. Since all the petitions are arising out of C.C.No. 14 of 2019, this Court disposes all the petitions by way of common order. Since the petitioners herein are 2nd, 4th, 5th & 6th accused in C.C.No. 14 of 2019, for the sake of convenience and clarity, they are referred to, as per their rank, in the charge sheet.
4. Gist of the case in C.C.No. 14 of 2019 is as follows:
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
K. Ramakrishna and Others vs. State of Bihar and Another
Munna Devi vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
Rajesh Bajaj vs. State NCT of Delhi
Rajib Rajan vs. R. Vijayakumar
State of T.N. vs. N. Suresh Rajan
State by Karnataka Lokayukta, Police Station, Bengaluru vs. M.R. Hiremath
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of evidence to support allegations of corruption and wrongful gain, as well as the legality of government discretionary quota allot....
(1) Normally, criminal proceedings should not be quashed in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when after a thorough investigation charge-sheet has been filed – At the stage of discharge an....
The court clarified that prima facie evidence suggests adequate grounds exist to proceed with charges, and that the responsibility for plot allotments must be appropriately examined in trial.
At the stage of framing the charge, the truth, veracity, and effect of the evidence proposed by the prosecutor are not meticulously judged.
Investigation into offence and elaborate appreciation of evidence is not required, and is rather discouraged, at stage of framing of charges and only material prima facie establishing a case against ....
No wrongful loss or gain established, validating discretionary housing allotment processes when executed transparently under legal guidelines.
The court decided that sufficient grounds for proceeding with charges under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC were established against the Executive Officer.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.