R. SUBRAMANIAN, SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Sumathy Venu – Appellant
Versus
A. R. Venu – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Sections 19 (1) of Family Court Act, 1984 and Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 06.08.2014 passed in HMOP.No.607 of 2006 (Dissolution of Marriage) and H.M.O.P.No.526 of 2007 (Restitution of Conjugal Rights) on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore by allowing the appeals.)
Common Judgment:
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup, J.
1. These Appeals filed by the Appellant/Wife as Party-in-person against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Judge, Family Court, Coimbatore granting decree of divorce to the Respondent/Husband in H.M.O.P.No.607 of 2006 on the ground of cruelty by the Appellant/Wife and dismissing the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed in H.M.O.P.No.526 of 2007 by the Appellant/Wife.
2. It is the contention of the Appellant/Party-in-person that after filing of the Appeal as C.M.A.SR.No.82307 of 2014 and issuing notice before numbering the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, the Respondent/Husband had contracted second marriage on the strength of the decree of divorce granted by the learned Judge, Family Court, Coimbatore in H.M.O.P.No.607 of 2006.
2.1. It is her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.