SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1939

R. VIJAYAKUMAR
M. Paulchamy – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajakumari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:G. Thalaimutharasu, Advocate. For the Respondent:M.P. Senthil, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure r/w Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Paramakudi in H.M.C.M.A.No.2 of 2017 dated 31.10.2018 by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi in H.M.O.P.No.83 of 2012, dated 20.04.2017.

Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure r/w Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Paramakudi in H.M.C.M.A.No.4 of 2017 dated 31.10.2018 by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi in H.M.O.P.No.67 of 2012, dated 20.04.2017.)

Common Judgement:

1. The appellant herein had filed H.M.O.P.No.67 of 2012 on the file of Sub Court, Paramakudi seeking divorce on the ground of mental cruelty and desertion. The wife had filed H.M.O.P.No.83 of 2012 on the file of Sub Court, Paramakudi for restitution of conjugal rights. Both the petitions were heard together. The divorce petition filed by the husband was d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top