SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1289

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.
Priyadharshini & Another – Appellants
Versus
State Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Chennai & Another – Respondents
Crl. O.P. No. 5307 of 2023
Decided On : 08-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:R. Thulasi, Advocate. For the Respondents:S. Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

Guidelines to prevent police harassment during enquiry/investigation and the obligation of individuals to cooperate with police summons.

Headnote:

Harassment - Police Enquiry - The court issued guidelines to prevent harassment by the police during enquiry/investigation and directed the petitioners to appear for the enquiry and cooperate with it.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a petition to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass them in view of a false complaint received from Narendran and his family members. The police had registered a case based on Narendran's complaint alleging attempted murder by the petitioners.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioners to appear for the enquiry and cooperate with it, while issuing guidelines to prevent harassment by the police during enquiry/investigation.

Issues: Harassment by police during enquiry, non-cooperation of petitioners with the police summons.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for police to follow specific guidelines when summoning individuals for enquiry/investigation and directed the petitioners to cooperate with the police enquiry.

Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of with the court's direction for the petitioners to appear for the enquiry and cooperate with it.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in view of the false complaint received from the said Naredran and his family members.)

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in view of the false complaint received from the said Narendran and his family members.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that first petitioner''s husband Narendran gave a false complaint against the petitioners. On that basis, second respondent is unnecessarily harassing the petitioners.

3. In response, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that Narendran gave a complaint against the petitioners alleging that petitioners tried to murder him. On the basis of the complaint, a case in C.S.R.No.15 of 2023 was registered and enquiry is pending. Despite sending three summons for appearance for enquiry, petitioners have not responded to the summons.

4. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the respondent police has been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

5. In the present case in hand, the petitioners had complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court''s intervention by way of a direction. The term ''harassment'' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

6. In order to meet such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a) While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation.

b) The respondent police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant.

c) The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.

d) The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation.

e) The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.

7. In the light of the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Court directs the petitioners to appear for the enquiry and co-operate with the enquiry.

8. With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top