IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
Pavithran – Appellant
Versus
State rep by its The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni & Others – Respondents
CRL. A(MD). No. 153 of 2023
Decided On : 09-03-2023
Bail - Criminal Appeal - SC/ST (POA) Act - The court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the order denying bail to the appellant, ordering his release on bail with certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed a petition for bail after being in judicial custody for a case involving previous enmity and causing injuries to the defacto complainant. The bail petition was initially dismissed by the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni.
Finding of the Court:
Considering the previous enmity between the parties and the discharge of the injured from the hospital, the court allowed the criminal appeal, setting aside the order and ordering the appellant's release on bail with specific conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail despite the charges against him under the SC/ST (POA) Act and other sections of the IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the previous enmity and the discharge of the injured, in deciding to grant bail to the appellant.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal was allowed, the order denying bail was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Schedule Caste and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 08.02.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2023 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni and to set aside the same and enlarge the appellant on bail in connection with Crime No.24 of 2023, dated 16.01.2023 on the file of the respondent Police.)
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2023, dated 08.02.2023, on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni and enlarge the appellant on bail in connection with Crime No.24 of 2023, dated 16.01.2023 on the file of the respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was some previous enmity between the appellant and the defacto complainant, due to which, the appellant and other accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. A case in Crime No.24 of 2023 was registered by the second respondent Police against the appellant and other accused persons, under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 427, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Sections 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST(POA)Act. The appellant was in judicial custody from 20.01.2023. He has filed a petition for bail in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2023 and the same was dismissed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni, on 08.02.2023. Challenging the same, the appellant has preferred this Criminal appeal.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the appellant is in judicial custody from 20.01.2023.
4. The learned counsel for the defacto complainant/third respondent has raised objections to grant bail to the appellant.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State would submit that though FIR came to be registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 427, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Sections 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST(POA)Act, subsequently, after initial investigation, the case was altered into Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Sections 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(y) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST(POA)Act and that the offence under Section 427 IPC was deleted. He would further submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is having one previous case for similar offence. He would further submit that the appellant is in judicial custody from 20.01.2023.
6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the facts that there existed previous enmity between the parties and that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to allow the Criminal Appeal by setting aside the order, dated 08.02.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2023 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 08.02.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2023 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Theni, is set aside. The appellant is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act Theni District, and on further conditions that:
(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act Theni District, may obtain a copy of their valid identity card to ensure their identity.
(b) the appellant shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 am, until further order
The court's decision to grant bail under the SC/ST (POA) Act was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the previous enmity between the parties and the discharge of the injured.
The court considered the circumstances of the case and the appellant's lack of previous cases in deciding to grant bail under the SC/ST(POA) Act.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the period of incarceration, the progress of the investigation, and the circumstances of the case.
The court considered the appellant's judicial custody, lack of previous similar or serious offenses, and the absence of serious injuries in the incident as grounds for allowing the Criminal Appeal an....
The court considered the period of incarceration and the absence of a presiding officer in the Special Court as factors in granting bail to the appellant.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances and duration of custody.
The court considered the nature of the allegations and the appellant's custody period in deciding to grant bail with conditions.
The main legal point established is that the decision to grant bail in cases involving serious charges and potential witness tampering or absconding should consider factors such as the accused's ante....
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the charges against the appellant.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.