BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
Ajithkumar - Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai & Others - Respondent
Crl. A.(MD)No. 471 of 2022
Decided On : 17-08-2022
Bail - Criminal Appeal - The court allowed the Criminal Appeal and set aside the order denying bail to the appellant, ordering his release on bail with certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was accused of attacking and causing the death of the defacto complainant's husband. The case was registered under various sections of the IPC and SC/ST Act. The appellant had been in custody since November 5, 2021.
Finding of the Court:
Considering the circumstances and the appellant's custody, the court allowed the Criminal Appeal, setting aside the previous order and ordering the appellant's release on bail with specific conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail despite the serious charges against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the appellant's custody duration and the circumstances of the case in deciding to grant bail.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1 of 2016, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 22.07.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.1592 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022 on the file of the III Additional District Court (PCR), Madurai, and to set aside the same and enlarge the appellant on bail in connection with Crime No.590 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police by allowing this criminal appeal.)
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order passed by thelearned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, in Crl.M.P.No. 1592 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022, dated 22.07.2022.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.11.2021, the appellant along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant's husband by using deadly weapons, due to that, the defacto complainant's husband was died on 04.11.2021. Hence, the second respondent registered a case against the accused in Crime No.590 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 307 and 302 IPC altered into Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 427 and 302 IPC r/w Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act.
3. The respondent police, after completing the investigation, has laid a final report and the case was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and that the appellant is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that that the appellant is in custody from 05.11.2021 onwards.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the appellant is having four previous cases, in which, three cases under IPC offences and one case under SC/ST Act. He would further submit that charge sheet has been filed and the case was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022 and the case is pending for framing of charges.
6. The learned counsel for the defacto complainant/third respondent has raised objections to grant bail to the appellant.
7. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the appellant is in judicial custody from 05.11.2021, this Court is inclined to allow the Criminal Appeal by setting aside the order, dated 22.07.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.1592 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the order dated 22.07.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.1592 of 2022 in Spl.S.C.No.32 of 2022 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, is set aside. The appellant is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned III Additional District Court (PCR), Madurai, and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Sessions Judge may obtain a copy of their valid identity card to ensure their identity.
[b] the appellant shall stay at Villuppuram and report before the Inspector of Police, Villuppuram Town Police Station at 10:30 a.m., for a period of 30 days and thereafter appear before the trial Court on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.
[c] the appellant shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the appellant shall co-operate with the investigation.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Sessions Judge/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the appellant in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances and duration of custody.
The court considered the period of incarceration and the absence of a presiding officer in the Special Court as factors in granting bail to the appellant.
The court's decision to grant bail under the SC/ST (POA) Act was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the previous enmity between the parties and the discharge of the injured.
The completion of investigation, period of incarceration, and the bail granted to co-accused are relevant factors in considering the grant of bail under the SC/ST Act and IPC.
The court considered the appellant's judicial custody, lack of previous similar or serious offenses, and the absence of serious injuries in the incident as grounds for allowing the Criminal Appeal an....
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the period of custody and the nature of the allegations.
The court has the discretion to grant bail, considering the circumstances of the case, including the period of judicial custody and completion of investigation.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the period of incarceration, the progress of the investigation, and the circumstances of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.