BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. ILANGOVAN, J.
S. Raj – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Tuticorin & Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD). No. 3767 of 2023
Decided On : 08-03-2023
Writ Petition - Temple Festival Permission - The court directed the parties to appear before the competent authority and resolve the issue, while also instructing the Sub Collector to conclude the 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings within one month.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought permission for conducting a temple festival, but the rival party did not appear before the peace committee meeting. The petitioner also mentioned a pending suit seeking declaration of title over the property where the festival was to be held.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the parties to appear before the competent authority and resolve the issue, while also instructing the Sub Collector to conclude the 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings within one month.
Issues: Permission for temple festival, pending suit for declaration of title, apprehension of breach of peace, 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the parties to resolve the issue before the competent authority and instructed the Sub Collector to conclude the proceedings within a specified time frame.
Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with directions for the parties to appear before the competent authority and for the Sub Collector to conclude the 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings within one month.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to grant permission for conducting the temple festival at Arulmigu Shri Muniyaswamy Thirukovil situated at Madathur, Milavittan Village, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District, scheduled between 09.03.2023 to 11.03.2023 by providing adequate police protection.)
1. This writ petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondentthe 3rd respondent to grant permission for conducting the temple festival at Arulmigu Shri Muniyaswamy Thirukovil situated at Madathur, Milavittan Village, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District, scheduled between 09.03.2023 to 11.03.2023 by providing adequate police protection.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.02.2023, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that a peace committee meeting was proposed to be held on 03.03.2023 by the Executive Magistrate, Tuticorin. On that ground, the matter has been listed today to inform the Court about the development.
3. Today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that only this petitioner appeared before the peace committee meeting and the rival party did not appear. Therefore, no resolution can be passed.
4. Now the counsel for the petitioner would submit that a suit in O.S.No.57 of 2022 has been filed by him, seeking declaration of title over the property, in which the above said Pedam is standing and as well as the property around it, against the rival party and the same is still pending. Pending the above said suit as usual they wanted to perform the car festival between 09.03.2023 to 11.03.2023. Over which, the above said permission was sought and that was not considered. Thus, this present writ petition has been filed and performance of the festival to the pedam will now going to be affected the rival parties'' right.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that apprehending the breach of peace, they have initiated 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings and recommendation has also been made to the Executive Magistrate / Sub Collector, Tuticorin on 13.02.2023. Now the above said proceedings is going to be commenced before the authority and no notice has been received by the petitioner so far.
6. Let notice be issued to the parties. Let the parties appear before the competent authority and workout their remedy there itself. The Sub Collector, Tuticorin, shall conclude the 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Depending upon the outcome of the above said enquiry, the aggrieved party can workout their remedy through appropriate proceedings.
7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
Emphasis on resolving the issue before the competent authority and timely conclusion of 107 Cr.P.C. Proceedings.
Court directs Peace Committee to assess temple festival feasibility amid disputes and pending civil suit without injunction.
The Court may grant permission for religious festivals despite pending rival claims by allowing participation for prayer purposes while relegating the determination of ultimate control to independent....
The court's decision was influenced by the circular memorandum issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, providing guidelines for consideration of applications seeking permission for cond....
The court has the authority to direct the consideration of representations for police protection for public events, based on relevant official circulars.
The High Court may issue a direction under Art. 226 of the Constitution to facilitate community events like temple festivals by mandating the involvement of revenue authorities in mediating local dis....
The court determined that police protection for a temple festival cannot be granted due to a pending civil suit over the temple's administration, yet allowed the festival to proceed under cooperative....
Authorities must consider representations, hear factions, permit joint/separate temple festivals, provide police protection.
Cooperation with the Peace Committee Meeting and consideration of law and order condition are crucial factors in granting permission for conducting festivals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.