SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 721

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
K. Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Thasildar Vedasandur Taluk – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C. Prithviraj.
For the Respondent: B. Thanga Aravindh.

JUDGMENT :

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third Respondent in his proceedings in C. No. 20/H1PS/2024 dated 22.03.2024 and quash the same as illegal, consequently direct the Respondents to grant permission and adequate police protection for conducting the annual village temple festival of Arulmighu Sri Vinayagar Sri Kaliyamman Sri Mariyamman Sri Muniyandi and Sri Karuppanasamy situated at S.Paraipatty Singarakottai village Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, scheduled to be held from 31.03.2024 to 02.04.2024.

1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner had filed this petition seeking to quash the proceedings in C. No. 20/H1PS/2024 dated 22.03.2024 and with a consequential direction to the respondents for granting permission and providing police protection to conduct the annual village temple festival of Arulmighu Sri Vinayagar, Sri Kaliyamman, Sri Mariyamman, Sri Muniyandi and Sri Karuppanasamy situated at S. Paraipatty, Singarakottai Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dind

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top