SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
G. Sundararajan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Department of Local Administration Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry & Others – Respondents
W.P.No. 6449 of 2015
Decided On : 08-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:T. Ravichandran, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, B. Ramaswamy, Additional Govertment Pleader (Puducherry), R2 & R3, T.P. Manoharan, Senior Counsel for T.M. Naveen, R5, D. Ravi Chander, Advocates, R4, R6 to R9, No Appearance.

The court upheld the discretionary power of the authorities to grant exemption from payment of entertainment tax based on compliance with the conditions stipulated in the policy, and emphasized that such exemption is a concession and not a matter of right.

Headnote:

Tamil Film 'I' - Entertainment Tax Exemption - G.O.Ms.No.30/LAS/ Local Administration Secretariat dated 19.06.2007, G.O.Ms.50/LAS/2007 Local Administration Secretariat dated 10.09.2007, G.O.Ms.No.51/LAS/2007 Local Administration Secretariat, dated 14.09.2007 - The court upheld the decision of the authorities to reject the claim for exemption from payment of entertainment tax for the Tamil film 'I' based on the expert committee's opinion that the title 'I' cannot be considered as a Tamil title for the purpose of tax exemption.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a film distributor, sought exemption from payment of entertainment tax for the Tamil film 'I' based on the argument that the word 'I' in Tamil can be considered as an exclamation and conveys a definite meaning.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, being a distributor, did not have the locus standi to seek exemption as the government order granting exemption was issued for the benefit of the theatre owners only. The court dismissed the writ petition.

Issues: The main issue was whether the title 'I' in Tamil could be considered for exemption from payment of entertainment tax and whether the petitioner, as a distributor, had the right to seek such exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the decision of the authorities to reject the claim for exemption was valid, as the title 'I' did not qualify as a Tamil title for the purpose of tax exemption, and the petitioner, as a distributor, did not have the right to seek exemption based on the government order.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in proceedings of the respondent 2 bearing No.303/Pu.Na./Va.pi.1/A4/2015 dated 11.02.2015 and quash the same insofar as it pertains to the Tamil Film “I” and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to grant exemption from payment of Entertainment Tax for the Tamil film “I” starring Vikram, Amy Jackson, Music by A.R.Rahman, Directed by Mr.Shankar towards the exhibition of the same within the Union Territory of Puducherry.)

The order of rejection rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for grant of tax exemption for their movie, namely, “I”, is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner is the proprietor of Sri Vijalakshmi Films, carrying out business in the Districts of Cuddalore, Vullipuram and in the Union Territory of Puducherry. The petitioner produced the movie called “I” and submitted application for grant of exemption for payment of entertainment tax. The application was filed on the ground that the movie is named in Tamil language and therefore, entitled to seek entertainment tax exemption based on the Government orders passed. The application was considered by the competent authorities and the request for exemption from payment of entertainment tax was rejected on the ground that the name of the film “I” cannot be construed as Tamil language within the parameters fixed in the Government Order and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to get exemption from payment of entertainment tax.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the word “I” in Tamil can be considered as exclamation and it conveys a definite meaning and thus, the decision taken by the authorities are erroneous and thus, the order impugned is to be set aside. It is further contended that in wall posters, advertisements, movie, etc., the petitioner used the Tamil word “I” and therefore, they are entitled for exemption from payment of entertainment tax, as per the Government Orders issued.

4. The learned counsel for the fifth respondent made a submission that the writ petition is not maintainable in view of the fact that, exemption from payment of entertainment tax was granted to the theatre owners and not to the distributors. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to get exemption, since the petitioner is a distributor admittedly. Thus, the writ petition is to be dismissed.

5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 made a submission that the Government issued orders granting exemption to the cine films with titles in Tamil and Telugu by payment of entertainment tax in G.O.Ms.No.30/LAS/ Local Administration Secretariat dated 19.06.2007. Pursuant to the decision taken by the Government of Puducherry, an expert committee was constituted to ensure as to whether the title is really in Tamil / Telugu or otherwise. The Committee was constituted vide G.O.Ms.50/LAS/2007 Local Administration Secretariat dated 10.09.2007.

6. The Expert Committee gone into the merits and demerits of the claim set out by the petitioner along with other applications and had taken a decision that the petitioner''s movie, viz., “I”, cannot be considered as a Tamil title and therefore, not entitled to seek exemption from payment of entertainment tax. The recommendations of the Expert Committee was accepted by the Government and accordingly, the application submitted by the petitioner was rejected.

7. The word “I” is a letter in Tamil language i.e., “caph; vGj;J”. No doubt, the letter “I” may convey certain meaning, since Tamil being an Ancient language. Even in ''Thirukkural'', the letter “I” has been used by the poet “Tiruvalluvar” to convey some meaning. However, in the context of the film, whether the word “I” may be construed as Tamil title or not is to be decided on merits and with reference to the contents in the movie.

8. The Expert Committee c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top