G. R. SWAMINATHAN
Govindasamy – Appellant
Versus
District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to entrust the interim custody of the petitioner''s vehicle by branding name Mahindra Bolero (Maxi Truck) vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 20 CD 8420, seized in connection with FIR No.44 of 2023 on the file of of the 2nd respondent Police.)
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
2. The petition mentioned vehicle was seized in connection with Crime No.44 of 2023 registered on the file of the 2nd respondent.
3. The petition mentioned vehicle is presently in the custody of the 2nd respondent. The vehicle is said to have been used for illegally transporting PDS rice.
4. It is of course open to the respondent authority to initiate confiscation proceedings. In this case we are concerned only with the issue of granting interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.
5. No purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle under the custody of the respondents. The Hon''ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Other
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.