SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2038

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Sathaiah – Appellant
Versus
Saravanakumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:R. Prasanna, Advocate. For the Respondent:N. Balakrishnan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Common Prayer:Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal orders dated 16.11.2022 made in I.A.Nos.456 of 2022 and 457 of 2022 in O.S.No.144 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.)

1.These civil revision petitions are preferred as against the fair and decreetal orders passed in I.A.Nos.456 of 2022 and 457 of 2022, dated 16.11.2022 in O.S.No.144 of 2013, on the file District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.

2. The facts in brief are as follows:-

The petition in I.A.No.456 of 2022 was filed by the defendants in the suit to reopen the defendants'' side evidence. The petition in I.A.No.457 of 2022 was filed by the defendants in the suit for further examination of D.W1 on the side of the defendants. After contest, the trial Court dismissed the above petitions. In the impugned order the trial Court has observed as hereunder:-

 Aggrieved by this, the present revision petitions are filed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the reasons assigned by the trial Court for dismissing the above applications is incorrect. The trial Court has erro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top