SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K. MANMADHA RAO
Battini Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
Konuri Venkata – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:K. Koutilya, Advocate
For the Respondents:Madhava Rao Nalluri, Advocate

ORDER

This Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred against the order, dated 21.06.2023, in I.A.No.288 of 2023 in O.S.No.395 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District filed under Section 151 and order 18, rule 7 of C.P.C seeking to recall DW-1 and DW-3 for further cross examination with regard to payment of consideration and other disputes of Ex.A1 transaction.

2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff; the respondents herein are the defendants in the suit.

3. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.395 of 2018 filed to cancel the Registered Sale Deed dated 11.04.2018 bearing No.1628 of 2018 executed in favour of 1st defendant by the plaintiff for the suit schedule property and same is pending. In the said suit an application in I.A.No. 288 of 2023 has been filed to recall DW-1 and DW-3 for further cross examination. The trial court dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner filed the application to fill up the lacunae and it would cause great prejudice to the 1st respondent and there is no justifiable cause to reopen and recall the witnesses after closure of the evide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top