Back
M. SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVEL
Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus calling for the entire records leading to the detention of petitioner''s son who is detained as Bootlegger at 4th respondent / Central Prison, Cuddalore, by the 2nd respondent vide his order C3/D.O/29/2022 dated 25.10.2022 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 5th respondent to produce the body of the detenu Surya, S/o.Murugan, aged about 25 years, from the 4th respondent / Central Prison, Cuddalore, before this Court and set him at liberty.)
M. Sundar, J.
1. When the captioned ''Habeas Corpus Petition'' (hereinafter ''HCP'' for the sake of convenience and clarity) was listed in the Admission Board on 03.02.2023, this Court made the following order:
''Captioned Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed in this Court on 19.01.2023 inter alia assailing a detention order dated 25.10.2022 bearing reference No.C3/D.O/29/2022 made by ''second respondent'' [hereinafter ''Detaining Authority'' for the sake of convenience and clarity]. To be noted, fifth respondent is the Sponsoring Authority.
2. Mother of the detenu i
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to provide translated documents to the detenu in a language he understands, as a constitutional right to ensure an effective rep....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing documents in a language known to the detenu to ensure their constitutional right to make an effective representation....
Failure to supply a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.
Failure to provide a translated version of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ....
Failure to furnish crucial documents in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the continued detention illegal.
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impaired his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.
The failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impaired his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering his continued detenti....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ill....
The failure to provide a correct translation of crucial documents in a language known to the detenu can impair the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the det....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
