SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ.
M. Rajeshwari – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 22492 of 2023
Decided On : 28-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Manoharan, Advocate. For the Respondent: E. Raj Thilak, Additional Public Prosecutor.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, in granting further leave to a convict prisoner based on the absence of serious impediments and the consideration of relevant circumstances.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Leave for Convict Prisoner - The court granted 33 days leave to a convict prisoner, subject to certain conditions, based on the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitioner sought further leave for her spouse, a convict prisoner, who was granted 28 days leave without escort. The petitioner's advanced pregnancy and medical complications, as well as the need to care for the convict prisoner's mother, were cited as reasons for seeking additional leave.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there were no serious impediments to granting leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. Considering the circumstances, the court granted 33 days leave to the convict prisoner, with the condition to maintain good conduct and to sign in at a specified police station daily. The convict prisoner was directed to surrender before the jail authorities on a specified date.

Issues: The issues involved the grant of further leave to a convict prisoner under specific conditions, taking into account the petitioner's circumstances and the relevant legal provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the absence of serious impediments under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, and the consideration of the petitioner's circumstances and the convict prisoner's conduct.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by granting 33 days leave to the convict prisoner, subject to specified conditions, and directed the convict prisoner to surrender on a specified date.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant leave for three months without escort from 28.07.2023 to the detenu Satishkumar, S/o.Ponmani, aged about 36 years, life Convict No.5247, detained at Central Prison, Palayamkottai.)

M. SUNDAR, J

1. This order will now dispose of the captioned ''Writ Petition'' (hereinafter ''WP'' for the sake of brevity and convenience).

2. Short facts are that the writ petitioner''s spouse one Satishkumar, S/o.Ponmani, aged 36 years is a lifer (Convict No.5247) detained in Central Prison, Palayamkottai; that the convict prisoner was granted 28 days leave without escort from 01.07.2023 to 28.07.2023 with a condition to surrender back on 29.07.2023 at 05.00 p.m; that this 28 days leave was granted by the second respondent; that the petitioner is in advanced stage of pregnancy and presence of her spouse by her side is necessary owing to certain medical complications and also to take care of convict prisoner''s mother (writ petitioner''s mother-in-law); that the convict prisoner is necessary for mobilising funds also; that these are the reasons that weighed with the second respondent in granting 28 days leave; that the captioned WP has been filed in this Court on 26.07.2023 seeking further leave from 29.07.2023.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for all the three respondents.

5. Owing to the limited scope of captioned WP, main writ petition is taken up in the Admission Board with the consent of both sides.

6. Learned Prosecutor submits that the convict prisoner has already availed 28 days leave.

7. We carefully considered the submission made on both sides. We are informed that the convict prisoner has not breached any of the conditions on which leave was granted, that the conduct of the convict prisoner while on leave has been blemishless and there is no disputation or contestation on this. We are also informed that there is no disputation or contestation regarding the advanced stage of pregnancy or ill health/complications qua convict prisoner''s spouse''s health (writ petitioner) and the convict prisoner''s mother''s ill health.

8. We find that there is no serious impediment as regards grant of leave qua Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

9. In the light of the narrative, discussion and dispositive reasoning, the convict prisoner is granted 33 days leave from 29.07.2023 subject to the condition that the convict prisoner shall continue his blemishless conduct while on leave and also sign in Thoothukudi South Police Station daily. Any other conditions imposed by the second respondent while granting 28 days leave will continue to operate.

10. Though obvious we make it clear that convict prisoner need not surrender tomorrow (29.07.2023) but shall surrender before the jail authorities in Central Prison, Palayamkottai on 01.09.2023 by dusk i.e., by 05.30 p.m.

11. Captioned WP disposed of in the aforesaid manner with the aforementioned directives/conditions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top