Back
R. MAHADEVAN, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Nagercoil – Appellant
Versus
S. Sundar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in W.A.No.1124 of 2021: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order of this Court in W.P.No.7070 of 2006 dated 22.12.2011.
in W.A.No.1150 of 2021: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order of this Court in W.P.No.5924 of 2006 dated 22.12.2011.
in W.A.No.1151 of 2021: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order of this Court in W.P.No.5923 of 2006 dated 22.12.2011.)
For the Appellant: Kavitha Nithyanandan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, M. Guruprasad, for R2 to R4, G. Nanmaran, SGP
Common Judgment:
Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
1. The short question that arises for consideration in these writ appeals is as to whether the workmen on completion of 480 days of service as Plantation Worker and thus being entitled to permanency in terms of Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as “the Permanent Status Act”), can be regularized as Forest Watcher which is a sanctioned post and placed on time scale of pay.
2. Brief facts:
(i) The appellant, which was or
The Conferment of Permanent Status Act did not apply to the employees of the Board, and the Labour Court erred in granting retrospective regularisation without adjudication of disputed issues.
The court established that regularization of daily wage workers requires adherence to specific government resolutions and the existence of sanctioned posts, not merely the completion of five years of....
Long-term engagement of employees for over 240 days establishes entitlement to regularization, reinforcing the principle against unfair labor practices applicable to public sector employment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the conditions required for the regularization of workmen, as per the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 and the standing orders....
The judgment emphasizes the statutory rights of industrial workers and the prohibition of unfair labour practices under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
The court ruled that mere continuous service as contract labour does not establish an employer-employee relationship necessary for conferment of permanent status under the Tamil Nadu Act.
The court upheld the Tribunal's awards for employee regularization, emphasizing the prohibition of unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act, while clarifying the need for state approv....
Workmen completing 480 days of service are entitled to permanent status under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments Act, regardless of subsequent classification as contract labourers.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
