SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2300

M. DHANDAPANI
K. Dhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:Balan Haridas, M. Imthias, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in W.P.No.6342 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus after calling for the concerned records from the first respondent, quash the award of the first respondent Tribunal in I.D.No.120 of 2015 dated 26.09.2016 in so far as denying the relief of reinstatement, full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits and consequently direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner with full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits.

W.P.No.7304 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent namely the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court relating to the award dated 26.09.2016 passed in I.D.No.120 of 2015 and quash the same.)

1. W.P.No.6342 of 2017 has been filed by the Workman seeking to quash the award of the first respondent in I.D.No.120 of 2015 dated 26.09.2016 in so far as denying the relief of reinstatement, full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits and to consequently direct th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top