Back
K. RAJASEKAR
C. Dhanapal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India owing Southern Railway, Rep. by its General Manager, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, against the order dated 27.08.2015 made in O.A.No.(II-U) 325 of 2013 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench.)
1.This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the applicant against the order of dismissal in O.A.No.(II-U) 325/2013, on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, wherein, the Tribunal has dismissed the Claim Petition filed, for the death of one Kanthayee in untoward incident.
2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to status and ranking before the Trial Court.
3. The case of the applicant is as follows:
The applicant is the son of the deceased Kanthayee, was self employee, on 23.10.2011 at about 19.00 hours, while detraining from Erode to Jolarpet Passenger Train at Neikarapatti, Railway Station, accidentally fell down and succumbed to injuries at about 22.55hours. Hence, application filed under Section 16 r/w 123 (c) (2) and 124-A of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, claiming a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as compensation.
4. The respondent -Southern Railway has filed the counter and contended that the deceased
The main legal point established in the judgment is the burden of proof on the claimant, the definition of a bona fide passenger, and the presumption against the railways to rebut the claim.
The burden of proof lies on the Railway Administration to establish the deceased's status as a bona fide passenger, and the absence of a ticket does not necessarily negate this claim.
The burden of proof lies on the railway administration to prove that a deceased passenger was not a bona fide passenger.
The Court ruled that in compensation claims for railway accidents, the presumption is that a passenger holds a valid ticket, shifting the burden of proof to railways to disprove this status.
The court established that minor discrepancies in documentation do not negate a claim for compensation under the Railways Act when substantial evidence supports the claim of an untoward incident.
Lost ticket does not disprove bona fide passenger status if supported by witness statements and official reports confirming fall from running train.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
