SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2722

P. VADAMALAI
Amsavalli – Appellant
Versus
Tharmaraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:G. Dhivya Bharathi, Advocate. For the Respondent:B. Azhagesh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 r/w Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dindigual in C.M.A.No.41 of 2019 dated 23.02.2022, confirming the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Vedasandur in H.M.O.P.Nos.38 of 2015 and 23 of 2019 dated 12.09.2019.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2022 passed in C.M.A.No.41 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2019 passed in H.M.O.P.Nos.38 of 2015 and 23 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Vedasandur.

2. The appellant is the respondent in H.M.O.P.No.38 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Vedasandur.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as petitioner/husband and respondent/wife as arrayed in H.M.O.P.No.38 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Vedasandur.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife. They developed love each othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top