Yuvaraj vs State rep. by The Additional Superintendent of Police CBCID, Namakkal District

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1800

M. S. RAMESH, N. ANAND VENKATESH
Yuvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Additional Superintendent of Police CBCID, Namakkal District – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:Gopalakrishna Lakshmana Raju, Senior Counsel for M/s. Rishwant S.G.L,, A. Ramesh, Senior Counsel for C. Arun Kumar, Senthil Kumar, R. Navaneethaakrishnan, ARL.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel, KMC. Arun Mohan, S. Ashok Kumar, Senior Counsel, M. Jagadeesh Pandian, N. Anandha Padmanabhan, Senior Counsel for M/s. APN Law Associates, T. Lajapathi Roy, Senior Counsel for S. Rajasekar, A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, S. Sabbani Karuburajothi, Advocates, N. Anandapadmanabhan, Senior Counsel, Bhavani Mohan, Special Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., r/w 14A(1) Sc/ST Act, to call for the records relating to the judgment passed in Spl.SC.No.31 of 2019 dated 08.03.2022, on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, [Special Court for SC/ST Act Cases (PCR)] Madurai and set aside the same and acquit the Appellant/Accused No.1 from all the charges levelled against him.)

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

1. To facilitate analysis and for ease of reference, this judgment is structured in the following way:

S No	Segment Heading	Paragraphs
I.	PRELUDE	2
II.	THE APPEALS	3-5
III.	CASE OF THE PROSECUTION	6-59
IV.	PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT	60-67
V.	THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS	68-73
VI.	DISCUSSION	74-252
VII.	CONDUCT OF PW-4	253-255
VIII.	OTHER SUBMISSIONS MADE ON THE SIDE OF THE APPELLANT	256-270
IX.	APPEALS AGAINST ACQUITTAL AND APPEAL SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF SENTENCE	271- 284
X.	THE APPEALS OF A13 AND A14	285-290
XI.	MODIFICATION OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN RESPECT OF A1-A3 & A8-A12	291-295
XII.	FINAL CONCLUSIONS	296-298

I. PRELUDE

2. This is a case which brings out the dark side of human behaviour. It focuses our attention to the ugly facets of our soc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1800

M. S. RAMESH, N. ANAND VENKATESHYuvaraj – AppellantVersusState rep. by The Additional Superintendent of Police CBCID, Namakkal District – Respondent

M. S. RAMESH, N. ANAND VENKATESH
Yuvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Additional Superintendent of Police CBCID, Namakkal District – Respondent