SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1980

L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Balakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Perumal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:S. Ramasamy, Advocate. For the Respondent:R.J. Karthick, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2008 passed in A.S.No.17 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul as reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.37 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Nilakkottai.)

1.This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the order passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge''s Court at Dindigul in A.S.No.17 of 2005 by reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.37 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Nilakkottai.

2. The original suit in O.S.No.37 of 2004 was one for damages for an amount of Rs.31,000/- seeking to compensate the unforeseen difficulties and loss of income faced by the plaintiffs as a result of the false complaint lodged by the defendant as against the plaintiffs. The learned Trial Court framed three issues and the learned Trial Court was pleased to adjudicate the case on merits, decided all the three issues in favour of the plaintiffs and passed a decree directing the defendants to pay a compensation of Rs.5,000/- to the plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top