Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of litigation and initial decree details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments about maintainability of appeals and revisions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. observations on third-party objections in the execution process. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal provisions for resistance and adjudication in execution. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. determination of appealability under cpc provisions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. interpretation of decrees and orders under the cpc. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. final ruling on maintainability and application for conversion. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
1. By way of this civil revision filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. dated 16.08.2011, in Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2010, titled as Rattan Chand and others vs. Om Parkash and others , in terms whereof, learned Additional District Judge, in an appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure before him, set aside the order passed by the Court of learned Executing Court, i.e. the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.),
Revision petitions under Section 115 are non-maintainable against orders passed under Section 96; appeal should be under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of filing a certified copy of the decree along with the memorandum of appeal, and the court's consideration of the maintainability ....
The grounds for rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC cannot be examined at the stage of defendant's evidence and go into the merits of the suit, which should be decided during the....
Interlocutory orders prejudicial to a party can be challenged in a single revision along with the final order, as established in Section 105(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Point of law: Termination of contract - petitioner has failed to issue statutory notice under Section 125 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 to defendant No.l and therefore plaint was ....
The High Court reinforced that amendments are essential for justice, allowing the expansion of claims without changing the suit's fundamental nature, particularly in property disputes based on unprod....
An order reversing a trial court's rejection of a plaint is a remand order, not a decree, thus subject to different appeal provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
