IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
R. Nithya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Munirathanam Reddy Kamasani – Respondent
Crl. O.P. No. 21269 of 2023
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Suspension of Sentence - Non-bailable Warrant
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and filed an appeal seeking suspension of sentence. The Court below dismissed the application for suspension of sentence due to the petitioner's absence during the judgment, leading to a non-bailable warrant.
Finding of the Court:
The Court directed the petitioner to surrender, deposit 20% of the compensation amount, and granted interim bail for 60 days. Compliance with the deposit directive would lead to absolute bail, while failure would result in cancellation of interim bail and serving the sentence.
Issues: Challenge to the dismissal of the application for suspension of sentence due to the petitioner's absence during the judgment.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the petitioner's absence during the judgment and the issuance of a non-bailable warrant as grounds for dismissing the application for suspension of sentence.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was disposed of with directives for surrender, deposit, and interim bail, with consequences for compliance and non-compliance.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the record set aside the order dated 31.08.2023 made in petition for suspension of sentence vide Criminal M.P.No.1 of 2023 in C.A.No.498 of 2023 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)
1. This petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Court below in Crl.MP.No.1 of 2023 dated 31.08.2023, dismissing the application filed for suspension of sentence pending Criminal Appeal No.498 of 2023.
2. Heard Mr.R.Rangarajan learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and this Court has carefully considered the materials available on record.
3. The petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount as compensation and in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment.
4. The petitioner aggrieved by the Judgment of the Trial Court, filed an appeal before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl. A.No.498 of 2023 and also filed an application seeking for suspension of sentence. The Court below dismissed the application for suspension of sentence on the ground that petitioner was not present before the Trial Court on the date of passing of the Judgment and hence, a non bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner and therefore, the application for suspension of sentence is not maintainable. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal original petition has been filed before this Court.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of in the following terms:-
a) The petitioner is directed to surrender before the V Additional, City Civil Court, Chennai. on 19.09.2023 and shall file a bail application.
b) The petitioner is directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount fixed by the trial court within a period of 60 days from 19.09.2023.
c) The Court below shall grant an interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 60 days.
d) If the petitioner complies with the direction issued by this Court in clause (b), the bail order shall be made absolute by imposing necessary conditions. and
e) If the petitioner fails to deposit the amount as directed by this Court in Clause (b), the interim bail shall be cancelled and the petitioner shall be made to serve the sentence imposed by the trial Court.
AI
The court's discretion in granting suspension of sentence and bail, considering the petitioner's absence during the judgment and the issuance of a non-bailable warrant.
The Court has the discretion to impose conditions for suspension of sentence pending appeal, taking into consideration the circumstances of the case and the petitioner's ability to comply.
Appellate court can suspend sentence under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. without requiring surrender before functus officio trial court.
The key legal principle established is the applicability of the amended Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in appeals against the order of conviction and sentence for the offence under Sec....
Mandatory deposit of compensation may follow exception based on circumstances, per N.I. Act.
Appellate courts have the discretion to modify conditions of suspension of sentence, such as mandatory compensation deposits, in criminal appeals, taking into account the specific financial circumsta....
Judicial discretion can modify conditions for the suspension of sentences in light of the circumstances of the case.
The High Court has the jurisdiction to modify the quantum of compensation deposit directed by an appellate court under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as a condition for suspensi....
Modification of a deposit condition in a criminal appeal based on the merits of the case.
Modification of bond conditions and financial considerations in criminal appeals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.