IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Jayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
A.S. M. Karthick Kumar – Respondent
Crl. O.P. No. 21267 of 2023
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Suspension of Sentence - Court directs petitioner to surrender, deposit compensation amount, and grants interim bail
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to imprisonment. The petitioner filed an appeal and sought suspension of the sentence pending the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The Court directed the petitioner to surrender, deposit 20% of the compensation amount, and granted interim bail for 60 days. Failure to comply would result in cancellation of the interim bail and enforcement of the sentence.
Issues: Suspension of sentence pending appeal, non-appearance of petitioner, medical reports as evidence of inability to appear before the Court
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the petitioner's inability to appear, medical reports as evidence, and imposed conditions for surrender, deposit, and interim bail.
Final Decision: The petitioner was directed to surrender, deposit compensation amount, and granted interim bail for 60 days. Failure to comply would result in cancellation of the interim bail and enforcement of the sentence.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to set aside the Order dated 31.08.2023, passed in Criminal M.P.No.1 of 2023 in Criminal Appeal No.484 of 2023, passed by the Principle Session Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)
1. This petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Court below in Crl.MP.No.1 of 2023 dated 31.08.2023, dismissing the application seeking for suspension of sentence pending in Criminal Appeal No.484 of 2023.
2. Heard Mr.R.John Sathiyan, Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and this Court has carefully considered the materials available on record.
3. The petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount as compensation and in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment. The Trial Court had suspended the sentence till 17.08.2023.
4. The petitioner aggrieved by the Judgment of the Trial Court filed an appeal before the Principal Session Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl A.No.484 of 2023. Pending the appeal, an application was filed seeking for suspension of sentence. By the time this application was heard, the period for which the trial Court had suspended the sentence has expired and hence, the Court below has proceeded to dismiss the application and refused to entertain the same in the absence of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, this Criminal Original petition has been filed before this Court.
5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was in disposed and was not able to be present before the Court and to substantiate the same, the learned Senior Counsel brought to the notice of this Court the medical reports.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of in the following terms:
a) The petitioner is directed to surrender before the XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai on 19.09.2023 and shall file a bail application.
b) The petitioner is directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount fixed by the trial court within a period of 60 days from 19.09.2023.
c) The Court below shall grant an interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 60 days.
d) If the petitioner complies with the direction issued by this Court in clause (b), the bail order shall be made absolute by imposing necessary conditions. and
e) If the petitioner fails to deposit the amount as directed by this Court in Clause (b), the interim bail shall be cancelled and the petitioner shall be made to serve the sentence imposed by the trial Court.
AI
The Court has the discretion to impose conditions for suspension of sentence pending appeal, taking into consideration the circumstances of the case and the petitioner's ability to comply.
The court's discretion in granting suspension of sentence and bail, considering the petitioner's absence during the judgment and the issuance of a non-bailable warrant.
Appellate court can suspend sentence under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. without requiring surrender before functus officio trial court.
The key legal principle established is the applicability of the amended Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in appeals against the order of conviction and sentence for the offence under Sec....
Mandatory deposit of compensation may follow exception based on circumstances, per N.I. Act.
The court emphasized the need for fair consideration of compliance with procedural orders in criminal appeals.
Judicial discretion can modify conditions for the suspension of sentences in light of the circumstances of the case.
Court confirmed 15% compensation deposit condition in cheque bounce appeal suspension due to abnormal delay.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.