SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2887

M. NIRMAL KUMAR
M. Sivabakiyam – Appellant
Versus
K. Kulanthaivel – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.M. Muralidharan
For the Respondent: Mr. Maruthi Raj, Legal Aid Counsel

ORDER :

Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 21.06.2017 in C.A.No.60 of 2016 passed by the II Additional District Sessions Court, Tirupur confirming the order of conviction in C.C.No.13 of 2015 by Fast Tract Court, Tirupur.

This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the concurrent finding of the Courts below holding the petitioner guilty of offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. In C.C.No.13 of 2015, the trial Court by judgment dated 26.04.2016 found the petitioner guilty, convicted and sentenced her to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo one month simple imprisonment. On appeal, the conviction and sentence was confirmed by the II Additional District Sessions Court, Tirupur in C.A.No.60 of 2016. Aggrieved by that, the petitioner has preferred this present petition.

3. The case of the complainant is that the petitioner / accused is a good friend of the respondent / complainant. On 04.06.2012, the petitioner approached the complainant for a loan amount of Rs.7 lakhs for her urgent family need and business expenses and assured to repay the same dur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top