SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2959

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Mariyammal – Appellant
Versus
Atchanna – Respondent
S.A.(MD)No.687 of 2021 and C.M.P(MD)No.9153 of 2021
Decided on : 26-04-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Arumugam for Mr.S.Sadeskumar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Baalasundaram Senior Counsel for M/s.R.Ponkarthikeyan

The requirement of a registered instrument for property transfer under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act was emphasized, and adverse possession elements were outlined.

Headnote:

Section 100 - Second Appeal - Code of Civil Procedure - 54 of the Transfer of Property Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act

Fact of the Case:

The suit was filed for permanent injunction by the plaintiffs, claiming ownership of the properties. The defendant contested, claiming an oral sale of the properties and adverse possession.

Finding of the Court:

The trial court and the lower Appellate Court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, rejecting the defendant's claims of oral sale and adverse possession.

Issues: Ownership of the properties, validity of oral sale, adverse possession, and entitlement to permanent injunction.

Ratio Decidendi: The courts rejected the defendant's claims due to lack of documentary evidence for the oral sale, failure to prove adverse possession, and acceptance of the plaintiffs' ownership through partition deed and pattas.

Final Decision: The Second Appeal is dismissed, confirming the judgments of the lower courts.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed in A.S.No.45 of 2015 on the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District confirming the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2015 passed in O.S.No.199 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.

This Second Appeal has been filed challenging the concurrent findings of the courts below. The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.199 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti is the appellant herein. The respondents are the plaintiffs in the said suit. In the forthcoming paragraphs, the parties are described as per their litigative status in the suit.

2.(i) The suit was filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties. The plaintiffs claimed that they are the owners of the suit schedule properties by virtue of a partition deed dated 21.11.2012 registered as document No.4574 of 2012. According to them, originally their father Perumal Nayackar was the owner of the suit schedule properties and patta No.764 was standing in his name for the suit schedule properties. According to the plaintiffs, their father Perumal Nayackar died on 14.08.1989 and even before his death, their mother Nachiyarammal died on 22.11.1987. Thereafter, the plaintiffs have partitioned the properties, which included the suit schedule properties under the aforementioned partition deed dated 21.11.2012 registered as document No.4574/2012.

2.(ii) According to the plaintiffs, the defendant has attempted to encroach upon the suit schedule properties belonging to the plaintiffs as the plaintiffs are residing in a different place and not in the Village, where the suit schedule properties located. According to them, having come to know that the defendant is attempting to encroach upon the suit schedule properties, they lodged a complaint with the Sub Inspector of Police on 20.07.2013 against the defendant. In such circumstances, the suit was filed for permanent injunction.

3. The defendant, as seen from the written statement filed by the defendant, states as follows:

i) The property originally belonged to Sankarappan and after his death, the legal heirs of Acha Nayackar and Perumal Nayackar entered into partition of the properties, which included the suit schedule properties.

ii) The suit schedule properties were allotted to Perumal Nayackar, the father of the plaintiff and other properties were allotted to Acha Nayackar and both peacefully enjoyed their respective properties;

iii) Acha Nayackar had only one son by name Subburaj, the husband of the defendant. According to the defendant, Perumal Nayackar approached Subburaj for developing business of the first plaintiff namely, Atchanna and offered the suit schedule properties for sale and the same was accepted by Subburaj;

iv) On 06.06.1994, 29 years ago, Perumal Nayackar and the first plaintiff orally sold the suit schedule properties to Subburaj, the husband of the defendant for a sale consideration of Rs.27,000/-;

v) From the date of oral sale, Subburaj, the husband of the defendant was paying kist in his name and enjoying the suit schedule properties peacefully;

vi) After the death of Subburaj, the suit schedule properties and other properties were jointly enjoyed by his wife, the defendant in the suit and other legal heirs;

vii) The plaintiffs have no right over the suit schedule properties;

viii) After purchase on 06.06.1994 through an oral sale deed, the defendant's husband Subburaj has deepened the well measuring 23 gajam and has been using the same for his irrigation purpose;

ix) The defendant and her family members were enjoying ancestrally the properties situated at Villicheri Village bid-II in S.No.5/6-B, 5/6-D and 5/6-E and 9/3-C and cultivating crops over the same and irrigating through the well situated in S.No.5/6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top