SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3906

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.Dhandapani, J.
P.Shanthi - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD)No.4825 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4198 to 4200 of 2020
Decided On : 21-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Sadeskumar
For the Respondent: Mr. S.P. Maharajan Special Govt. Pleader, Mr. S. Mohammed Suhil for M/s. Ajmal Associates

The relevance of qualifications and community reservation in the appointment process for public positions under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Appointment Dispute - Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - [Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994] - The court discussed the appointment process for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary, emphasizing the relevance of qualifications and community reservation. The court found the selection process arbitrary and set aside the appointment order in favor of the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a destitute widow and daughter of an ex-serviceman, applied for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary. Despite possessing more qualifications than the selected candidate, the petitioner was not appointed, leading to the filing of the Writ Petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the selection process arbitrary and set aside the appointment order in favor of the petitioner, directing the third respondent to issue a posting order to the petitioner within four weeks.

Issues: Dispute over the appointment process for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary, considering the qualifications and community reservation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the relevance of qualifications and community reservation in the appointment process, finding the selection process arbitrary and setting aside the appointment order in favor of the petitioner.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition is allowed, and the third respondent is directed to issue a posting order to the petitioner within four weeks. No costs are awarded, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

ORDER :

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.808/2018/Vu1 dated 05.11.2019 and quash the same as illegal, ultravirus without any authority without any sanction and consequently to direct the third respondent herein to appoint the petitioner for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary of Matthakarai Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the third respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.808/2018/Vu1, dated 05.11.2019, quash the same and consequently, direct the third respondent herein to appoint the petitioner for the post of Village Panchayat Secretary of Matthakarai Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner's husband passed away on 03.06.2014 leaving behind the petitioner and two children. The petitioner has completed 10th Standard during the year 1999 and she has also completed Nursing Assistant / Auxiliary Course and the same have been registered before the District Employment Office, Madurai. She has also possessed priority category as Destitute Widow and the same has also been registered in the Employment Registered Office with the seniority, dated 26.10.2015. In the said circumstances, the third respondent has published a Notification calling for application to fill up the post of Village Panchayat Secretary, dated 27.03.2018 for Matthakarai Village for the rotation of BC Women other than Muslims category. As per the said Notification, the petitioner applied for the said post along with her Educational Qualification, Nativity Certificate, Community Certificate and Priority Certificate as Destitute Widow and Ex-Serviceman Dependency Certificate. On satisfying with the same, the third respondent called the petitioner for interview vide proceedings, dated 05.02.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner attended the interview on 14.02.2019 and produced all documents before the Committee. However, without considering the petitioner's candidature and qualification, the fourth respondent was selected. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a Destitute Widow and daughter of Ex-Serviceman and she also obtained an Ex-Serviceman Dependency Certificate. Apart from that, she has also completed Nursing Assistant / Auxiliary Course and the age of the petitioner is 34 years, whereas, the age of the fourth respondent is only 20 years. At the time of interview, the fourth respondent did not possess the other qualifications which were possessed by the petitioner. Hence, the appointment of the fourth respondent is not sustainable and arbitrary and accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.

4. Per contra, the learned Special Government Pleader and learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent would submit that the post of Village Panchayat Secretary, Matthakarai Village was reserved for Backward Classes (other than Muslims) (non-priority) candidates and as such, possessing Destitute Widow Certificate has no relevance in the selection. The petitioner and the fourth respondent are residing in the same Village Panchayat and are hailing from BC Community. The petitioner's age is 34 years and the fourth respondent's age is 20 years. Both have studied upto 10th Standard and seven candidates were short-listed and interviewed. During the interview, the fourth respondent was preferred over other six candidates including the petitioner herein. The selection of the fourth respondent is based on Expert Committee's opinion / Selection Committee that was mainly based on the performance of the fourth respondent in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top