IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS, (MADURAI BENCH)
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
T. Baskaran and Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable, Endowments Department and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD)Nos.11154 & 11278 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.7985 and 8035 of 2022
Decided On : 25-08-2022
Writ Petition - Challenge to Notices under Section 78(2) of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act 1959 - [Section 78(2) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act 1959] - The court discussed the validity of the impugned notices issued under Section 78(2) of the Act, highlighting the conditions of the Settlement Deed, the nature and character of the Samathi, and the authority of the first respondent to conduct an enquiry. The court emphasized the need for fact-finding in an enquiry and directed the petitioners to respond to the notice and appear before the first respondent for further proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged notices issued under Section 78(2) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act 1959, seeking explanation as to why the petitioners should be declared as encroachers of the Temple property. The petitioners claimed valid possession and enjoyment of the property for public causes and community service.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petitions with a direction to the first respondent to proceed with the enquiry as per the notice issued, emphasizing the need for fact-finding in an enquiry.
Issues: Validity of impugned notices, nature and character of the Samathi, authority of the first respondent to conduct an enquiry.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for fact-finding in an enquiry and directed the petitioners to respond to the notice and appear before the first respondent for further proceedings.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed with a direction to the first respondent to proceed with the enquiry as per the notice issued. The petitioners were directed to respond to the Notice and appear before the first respondent for further proceedings.
ORDER :
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the record pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in M.P.No.45/2022/Aa3, dated 26.05.2022 and quash the same.)
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Miscellaneous Petition No.47 of 2022/Aa3, dated 26.05.2022 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.)
In W.P(MD)No.11278 of 2022, the petitioner is challenging Notice issued in M.P.No.47/2022/Aa3, and in W.P(MD)No.11154 of 2022, the petitioners are challenging Notice issued in M.P.No. 45/2022/Aa3, respectively dated 26.05.2022, both issued under Section 78(2) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act 1959, seeking explanation as to why the petitioners to be declared as encroachers of the Temple property.
2. The contention of the petitioner in W.P(MD)No.11278 of 2022 is that the community elders of 24 Manai Telungu Chettiars' constituted a Trust in the name of “M/s.Morupatti 24 Manai Telungu Chettiars Charitable Trust", by executing a Deed of Trust, dated 03.07.1992. The Trust has purchased 50 cents of land in TS.No.860/2, Ward No.3, Block No.18, East Giri Street, Palani Town, Dindigul District, to an extent of 34,899 Sq.ft. The petitioner Trust purchased the property by a Sale Deed, dated 13.07.1992. Ever since the purchase, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the property.
2. xxxx”
4. The property originally belonged to one K.Mariappan. By a Settlement Deed, dated 21.07.1941, the said Mariappan executed the deed in favour of one Sadaiappa Chettiar on certain conditions. One of the conditions is that, after life time of the said Mariappan, Sadaiappa Chettiyar and his wife V.Parvathi Ammal were at liberty to enjoy the property, without subjecting the property to any encumbrance. Further, after the lifetime of Mariappan, they could enjoy the landed property and can be transferred to third parties, if they wished.
5. One of the primary conditions is that at the North East Corner of the property, the Mortal remains of aforesaid Mariappan buried and every year, on the date of Death Anniversary, Poojas shall be conducted by Sadaiyappa Chettiyar and Parvathi Ammal and after them, their legal heirs and the purchasers of the property, if any. Thus, the registered Settlement Deed made it very clear that the property can be transferred to third parties.
6. In the meanwhile, the petitioner came to understand that by proceedings of the Inspector, HR & CE, Palani in Na.Ka.No.110 of 2018, dated 05.07.2018, a report was submitted to the Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, stating that on 11.06.2018, a spot inspection was conducted by the Tahsildar, Palani and other officials, based on the complaint that the property of 'Arulmigu K.Mariappan Samathi' was illegally sold. Further, the report reveals that there are several buildings constructed around Samathi and there are several buildings and shops constructed in the property. Hence, the Inspector, HR & CE, recommended to recover the portion of the aforesaid property and to take action against the persons, who sold the property under Land Grabbing Law. The Assistant
Radhakanta Deb and Anothert Vs. Commissioner of HR & CE, Orissa
The court emphasized the importance of fact-finding in an enquiry and directed the petitioners to respond to the notice and appear before the first respondent for further proceedings.
Property rights concerning temple lands require valid ownership evidence; proceedings under Section 78 are unsustainable without it.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of property ownership, the requirement of notice under S.80 C.P.C., and the maintainability of the suit under S.108 of the Hindu ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.