SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2916

R. VIJAYAKUMAR
K. Jeyakumar – Appellant
Versus
L. Arunachalam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.G. Shankarganesh.

ORDER :

(Prayer : Civil Revision Case is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, to allow this civil revision petition setting aside the order dated 11.11.2022 made in E.A.No.160 of 2022 in E.P.No.123 of 2018 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai.)

This civil revision petition has been filed challenging an order under which the request of the judgment debtor to grant stay of the execution proceedings as contemplated under Order 21 Rule 26 C.P.C was rejected.

2. The tenant/petitioner has suffered an order of eviction in RCOP.No.23 of 2017. The tenant suffered an order of eviction due to default in payment of the amount as per order under Section 11(4) of the Rent Control Act. A consequential order of eviction was passed in RCOP.No.23 of 2017. According to the tenant, he has filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority with delay and it is yet to be numbered.

3. Based upon the eviction order, the landlord had filed E.P.No. 123 of 2018 and delivery was ordered. However, when an attempt was made to take delivery, it was found that the petition premises was under lock and key. Therefore, an application was filed by the Ameen to take police protection and for break open.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top