SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2938

P. VADAMALAI
M. Micheal Raj – Appellant
Versus
Rayammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Vellaichamy
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Ashok Kumar

ORDER :

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to setaside the order made in I.A.No.334 of 2017 in O.S.No.88 of 2012, dated 01.11.2017 passed by the Sub Court, Sivakasi and allow the revision.

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to setaside the order made in I.A.No.334 of 2017 in O.S.No.88 of 2012, dated 01.11.2017 passed by the Sub Court, Sivakasi.

2. The brief facts of the case :

The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.88 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Sivakasi. He filed a suit against the defendants 1 to 5 for the relief of declaration and consequential permanent injunction and for mandatory injunction to remove the encroachments made in the 2nd item of suit property. Pending suit, the plaintiff has filed the petition in I.A.No.334 of 2017 in O.S.No.88 of 2012 for appointment of advocate/commissioner to visit the suit property along with the Village Administrative Officer and Surveyor and to file report in respect of encroachment. The defendants have strongly resisted the petition by filing detailed counter. After hearing both, the Trial Court has dismissed the petition in I.A.No.334 of 2017 in O.S.No.88 of 2002 on 01.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top