BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Saleth Mary & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
M/s. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, Erode - Respondent
C.M.A. (MD) No. 1155 of 2017
Decided On : 08-01-2024
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation for Motor Accident - Section 173 - M.C.O.P.No.960 of 2015 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - The court discussed the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal and the factors to be considered while determining the income of the deceased. The court referred to the Syed Sadiq case 2014(1) TNMAC 495 (SC) and a judgment of the Madras High Court in 2019 (1) TNMAC page 54 (DB) High Court of Madras Andal Vs. Avinav Kannan and another, which provided guidelines for determining notional income of the deceased. The court also applied the Pranay Sethi Constitution Bench Judgment in the year 2017 to calculate future prospects and loss of income.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a fatal motor accident where the deceased and a pillion rider sustained fatal injuries due to a collision with a bus. The claimants sought compensation for the loss of life of the deceased.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Tribunal had awarded a low and meagre sum of compensation and proceeded to modify the notional income of the deceased based on legal precedents and guidelines provided by the Syed Sadiq case and the Madras High Court judgment. The court enhanced the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Issues: The main issue was the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal and the factors to be considered while determining the income of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied legal precedents and guidelines provided by the Syed Sadiq case, a judgment of the Madras High Court, and the Pranay Sethi Constitution Bench Judgment to determine the notional income of the deceased and calculate future prospects and loss of income.
Final Decision: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was partly allowed, and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was enhanced from Rs.6,93,000 to Rs.18,97,432. The respondent/ State Transport Corporation was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount with accrued interest and costs to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.960 of 2015 on the file of the Special District Judge / Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli, within a period of eight weeks.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and decree dated 03.03.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.No.960 of 2015 on the file of the Special District Judge / Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli and seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only).)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been directed against the Judgment and decree dated 03.03.2016 passed in M.C.O.P.No.960 of 2015 on the file of the Special District Judge / Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli by the appellants / claimants challenging the quantum of the award.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred herein as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts in a nutshell are as follows:
(i) This is a fatal case. On 14.05.2015 at about 21.30 Hrs, the deceased one Ravichandran alias Alex was driving his Motor cycle bearing registration No.TN 81 A 1461 returning from Kangeyam in Tiruppur District to Trichy. One Thangamalaiyali / co-worker was also travelled along with him as pillion rider. While the deceased was riding his motorcycle, keeping his left side i.e., in the north side of Karur – Trichy Main road, coming from west to east, near Kudil in Thirupparaithurai in Karur - Trichy main road, the respondent's TNSTC bus bearing registration No. TN 74 N 1533 in high speed from the opposite direction i.e., from east to west suddenly came towards right side and dashed against the petitioner's motorcycle. As a result of the said collusion, both the deceased and the pillion rider were thrown away and sustained multiple and fatal injuries. The deceased sustained fatal injuries on his head, neck and both legs and was taken to the Government Hospital, Trichy. However, he died while getting treatment in Government Hospital, Trichy on the same day. The postmortem of the deceased was done on the next day. At the time of the accident, the deceased was 26 years old and was working as a welder in a company namely M.M.Truss Fabrication & Erectors, Trichy-1, earned Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) per month.
(ii) Hence, the legal heirs of the deceased Ravichandran alias Alex / claimants have filed M.C.O.P.No.960 of 2015 on the file of the Special District Judge / Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Trichirappalli seeking compensation for the loss of life of the deceased Ravichandran alias Alex. The 1st petitioner is the mother of the deceased. The 2nd petitioner is the brother of the deceased. The respondent had fied a counter refuting the allegations setforth in the claim petition.
(iii) After considering the oral and documentary evidence and the arguments submitted by the respective parties, the Tribunal framed two issues. The learned Tribunal proceeded to conclude that the accident had happened only because of the rash and negligence of the driver of the respondent's bus. Hence, the learned Tribunal has fixed the liability on the part of the respondent and also awarded a sum of Rs.6,93,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs and Ninety Three Thousand only) as compensation with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of petition to till the date of realisation. The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal are as follows:
| S.No. | Description | Amount |
| 1. | Loss of dependency | Rs. 6,48,000/- |
| 2. | Loss of love and affection | Rs. 20,000/- |
| 3. | Funeral expenses and Transport | Rs. 25,000/- |
|
| Total | Rs.6,93,000/- |
Aggrieved by that award, the claimants have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement.
4. The learned counsel for the appellants / claimants has submitted that the Tribunal has awarded a very low and meagre sum of compensation. At the time of occurrence in the year 14.05.2015, the deceased namely Ravichandran alias Alex was working as a welder and earned Rs.20
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal precedents and guidelines for determining notional income of the deceased and calculating future prospects and loss of inc....
The Court considered the deceased's qualifications, age, and future prospects to determine the notional income and enhance the compensation accordingly.
The court recalibrated compensation for a road accident victim's heirs based on reasonable income estimation, deviating from the original Tribunal assessment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance compensation based on a thorough analysis of the deceased's income, future prospects, and other compensations.
In motor accident compensation cases, where proof of income is unsubstantiated, the court may fix reasonable notional income based on prevailing judicial precedents for the relevant year, applying fu....
The main legal point established is the application of Pranay Sethi's case in determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation for the death of the deceased in a motor accident, considering various factors such as monthly income, future pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to modify compensation based on the deceased's earnings, age, and nature of work, as well as the application of relevant lega....
The court re-determined the notional income and adjusted the compensation for loss of income, love and affection, and loss of estate based on legal precedents and the nature of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.