HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
P.S. Subramanian - Appellant
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Non-corporate Ward 19(6), Chennai & Anr. - Respondents
W.P. No. 22319 of 2023 & W.M.P. Nos. 21699 & 21700 of 2023
Decided On : 03-01-2024
Income Tax Act - Writ of Certiorari - Section 148, 147, 144, 144B, 221(1) - The court discussed the legal provisions of Section 148, 147, 144, 144B, and 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the liability of legal representatives under Section 159 and the procedure for filing appeals as legal representatives of deceased assesses.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the notice, assessment order, and notice of demand issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the name of the deceased assessee, the wife of the petitioner. The petitioner claimed that the deceased had no income of her own and that the income was declared in the petitioner's returns. The petitioner also challenged the appeal process as a legal representative of the deceased assessee.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, as the legal representative of the deceased assessee, is liable to pay any sum which the deceased would have been liable to pay if she had not died. The court also noted that the appeal filed by the petitioner as a legal representative had defects and should be cured. The court dismissed the writ petition but granted the petitioner liberty to cure the defects in the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Issues: The issues involved the liability of legal representatives under the Income Tax Act, the procedure for filing appeals as legal representatives of deceased assesses, and the validity of the notice, assessment order, and notice of demand issued in the name of the deceased assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the legal representatives are liable to pay any sum which the deceased would have been liable to pay if she had not died. The court also emphasized the need for the petitioner to cure the defects in the appeal filed as a legal representative before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to cure the defects in the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The recovery proceedings against the petitioner and legal representatives of the deceased assessee were kept in abeyance for a limited period of six months.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Respondents contained in its notice bearing DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2021- 22/1042102204(1), issued by the 1st Respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 30.03.2022 and all proceedings in furtherance thereof including but not limited to the assessment order bearing DIN: ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1050715820(1) passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 14.03.2023 and the notice of demand bearing DIN & Notice No.ITBA/RCV/S/221/2023-24/1053128441(1) issued by the 1st Respondent under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 24.05.2023, for PAN:AMLPN7769E, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-2016 and to quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal.)
1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition for the following relief:-
“Writ petition filed to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondents contained in its notice bearing DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148- 1/2021-22/1042102204(1), issued by the 1st respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.03.2022 and all proceedings in furtherance including but not limited to the assessment order bearing DIN : ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1050715820(1) passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 14.03.2023 and the notice of demand bearing DIN & Notice No.ITBA/ RCV/ S/2021/2023-244/1053128441(1) issued by the 1st respondent under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 24.05.2023, for PAN : AMLPN7769E, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 and to quash the same.”
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned notice dated 30.3.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the impugned assessment order dated 14.3.2023 passed for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 and notice of demand dated 24.05.2023 bearing reference DIN & Notice No.ITBA/ RCV/ S/2021/2023-244/1053128441(1) issued by the 1st respondent under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for PAN : AMLPN7769E, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-2016.
3. Earlier an assessment order dated 14.03.2023 was passed by the second respondent for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 under Section 147, 143(3), 144, 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the name of the deceased assessee, namely Late Mrs.Nirmala Subramanian, the wife of the petitioner herein. Assessee however died on 14.04.2023.
4. The petitioner has already filed a statutory appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the Assessment Order dated 14.03.2023 on 14.06.2023 in his capacity as the legal heir of the deceased Late Mrs.Nirmala Subramanian. The appeal has been filed with the PAN No.AMLPN7769E of the deceased assesee in Form- 35 in the individual capacity.
5. The appeal has been acknowledged by the Income Tax Department on 14.06.2023. The said appeal was filed without following the procedure prescribed for filing of such appeals by the legal heir of the deceased assessee. Thus, the appeal has not been numbered so far.
6. The petitioner has now filed this Writ Petition for the above relief by challenging the notice dated 30.03.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the name of the deseased assessee late Mrs.Nirmala Subramanian, the wife of the petitioner, the Assessment Order dated 14.03.2023 in the her name and notice dated 24.05.2023 issued in her name under Section 221 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which was received by the petitioner.
7. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner’s wife late Mrs.Nirmala Subramanian was a homemaker and that an immovable property worth Rs.1,20,00,000/-was purchased by the petitioner in her name from one Mr.K.Jayakumar on 27.10.2014 from and out of the income of the petitioner which was registered a
SupremeToday
The central legal point established in the judgment is the liability of legal representatives under Section 159 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the procedure for filing appeals as legal representativ....
Notice u/s.148A(b) to deceased assessee invalidates reassessment; no jurisdiction without fresh notice to legal heir.
Notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act to deceased persons are invalid, necessitating issuance to legal representatives for valid assessment proceedings.
Notice u/s 148 issued to deceased assessee is invalid and void ab initio; assessment thereon quashed. No statutory duty on legal heirs to intimate death; mere return filing does not validate jurisdic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.