Back
C. SARAVANAN
Container Corporation of India Limited (CONCOR), Represented by its Deputy General Manager, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government, Industries Department/Chairman – SIPCOT, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondents in respect of the Lease Deed dated 25.03.2011 between the petitioner and the respondents.)
1. This petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondents in respect of the Lease Deed dated 25.03.2011 between the petitioner and the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the second and third respondents have consented for appointment of an Arbitrator.
3. The learned Additional Solicitor General for the petitioner has suggested two names of Retired Judges of this Court.
4. Recording the request of the learned Additional Solicitor General for the petitioner, Hon'ble Mr.V.Bharathidasan, Retired Judge of this Court, is appointed as an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties. 5. The parties are at liberty to workout the venue for Arbitration at Chennai. 6.The Court is inclined to pass the followin
The court has the authority to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the appointed arbitrator must adhere to the provisions of the Act in resolv....
The court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when there is mutual consent and an existing arbitration agreement.
The central legal point established is the arbitrability of the dispute as per the terms of the Lease Deed and the court's authority to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration....
The court emphasized the authority under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to appoint an umpire arbitrator and affirmed that the disputes regarding the lease agreement are arbitrable.
The court's decision was based on the specific provisions of the lease agreement and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing the importance of compliance with the arbitration process.
The court upholds the arbitration clause in the agreement and appoints a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of a legal drill under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the expeditious disposal of petitions under ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
