SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3234

N. SATHISH KUMAR
D. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
K. Amavasai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :S. Srinivasa Raghavan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R3, D. Sasikumar, Additional Government Pleader, R1 & R2, V. Balaji, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 04.01.2020 made in O.S.No.133 of 2018 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Madurai.)

1. This Appeal suit has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 04.01.2020 made in O.S.No.133 of 2018 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Madurai. The appellant herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The respondents are the defendants.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their litigative status in the suit.

3. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his title to the suit properties and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff in the suit properties and also to declare the sale agreement dated 15.03.2007 as null and void.

4. The case of the plaintiff is described as follows:

i) The suit property originally belonged to one Seeniammal and Ramuthai Ammal by virtue of an assignment deed executed by the Government on 30.08.1983. Challenging the assignment, one Pappammal and Muthupillai @ Sivanammal filed separate petitions before the Sub Collec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top