SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3086

S. S. SUNDAR
A. Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Sethupathy – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :M. Kannan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, S. Rajasekar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.4 of 2015 by the Principal District Judge, Kancheepuram District at Chengalpattu, dated 23.10.2021, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.97 of 2009 by the Sub-Court, Tambaram, dated 13.06.2014.)

1. The 8th defendant in the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2009 on the file of Sub-Court, Tambaram, is the appellant in the above Second Appeal.

2. The 1st respondent in this Second Appeal, as plaintiff, filed the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2009 on the file of the Sub-Court, Tambaram, for a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit property measuring an extent of 1 Acre and 8 Cents as per document and 1 Acre and 19 Cents as per enjoyment in No.148, Okkium Thoraipakkam Village, Saidapet Taluk; for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property; for an injunction restraining the Sub-Registrar, Neelankarai, the 6th defendant in the suit, from completing the formalities of registering the fraudulent sale deed, dated 12.01.2000, executed by the 2nd defendant thr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top