SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3044

C. KUMARAPPAN
Jeyarathnam – Appellant
Versus
Samuel Nickson – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:P. Jessi Jeeva Priya, Advocate. For the Respondents:M.P. Senthil, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 03.08.2018, passed in I.A.No.328 of 2018 in O.S.No.20 of 2014, on the file of the District Munsif of Tiruchendur.)

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 03.08.2018, passed in I.A.No.329 of 2018 in O.S.No.20 of 2014, on the file of the District Munsif of Tiruchendur.)

Common Order:

1. The instant Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the order, dated 03.08.2018, passed in I.A.Nos.328 & 329 of 2018 in O.S.No.20 of 2014, on the file of the District Munsif, Tiruchendur.

2. The revision petitioner is the second respondent / second defendant, the respondents 1 and 2 herein are the petitioners / plaintiffs and the third respondent herein is the first respondent/ first defendant before the Court below.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to according to their litigative status before the trial Court.

C.R.P.(MD)No.1044 of 2019

4. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for the relief of declaration and possession, and also for the prayer co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top