Back
R. SUBRAMANIAN, R. KALAIMATHI
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Radhakrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family joint property ownership dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. dispute over land acquisition and business income (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. trial court's findings and issues framed (Para 12 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. arguments on property rights and presumption of acquisition (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding trust validity and property status (Para 35 , 56) |
| 6. claims of joint family business require clear evidence. (Para 36) |
| 7. evidential basis needed for presumption of joint family property. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 46) |
| 8. court dismisses unsupported claims on property ownership. (Para 52 , 54) |
| 9. trust creation and assumptions of joint family nature (Para 58 , 60 , 62) |
| 10. final verdict affirms mixed outcomes of appeals. (Para 67) |
| 11. final determination of property ownership and appeals (Para 68 , 70) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayers: This appeal is filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgement and decree made in O.S.No.2 of 2006 dated 30.08.2011 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court No. III) Viruddhachalam.
This appeal is filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
