IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. HEMALATHA, J.
Ram Thiyagarajan - Appellant
Versus
N. Sambasivam & Ors. - Respondents
Crl. R.C. Nos. 1405, 1406, 1407 & 1463 to 1465 of 2023 & Crl. M.P. Nos. 12010, 12016, 12017, 12901, 12902 & 12903 of 2023
Decided On : 13-09-2023
Negotiable Instruments Act - Impleading Company as Accused - Section 138 r/w 141 of NI Act - Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - [138, 141, 200, 204, 207, 313, 319, 397(1), 401] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the conditions necessary to establish an offence under Section 138, and the vicarious liability of the accused for the company's actions. The court also referred to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and its implications on the impleading of the company as an accused.
Fact of the Case:
The complainant filed private complaints against the accused for dishonor of cheques issued by the company. The accused contested the impleading of the company as an accused, citing technical and legal grounds.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the trial court's decision to allow the impleading of the company as an accused, considering the statutory notices issued and the vicarious liability of the accused for the company's actions.
Issues: Impleading of the company as an accused, compliance with statutory notice requirements, vicarious liability of the accused for the company's actions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the technical and curable defect in the complaint did not defeat the prosecution and trial against the accused. It also emphasized the vicarious liability of the accused for the company's actions.
Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Cases were dismissed, and the orders of the trial court were confirmed.
JUDGMENT
(Common Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397(1) r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 16.05.2023 in C.M.P. Nos.15483, 15482, 15484, 15485, 15486 and 15487 of 2022 in STC Nos.1095, 1096, 1098, 824, 823, and 1097 of 2019, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore.)
Common Order:
1. Challenge in these Criminal Revisions are made to the orders dated 16.05.2023 in C.M.P. Nos.15483, 15482, 15484, 15485, 15486 and 15487 of 2022 in STC Nos.1095, 1096, 1098, 824, 823, and 1097 2019 , on the file of the Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore.
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in STC Nos. 1095, 1096, 1098, 824, 823, and 1097 2019, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore.
3. The 1st respondent/complainant filed 6 private complaints under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the revision petitioner/accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 r/w 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
4. The case of the complainant in a nutshell is as follows:
4.1. The complainant is a proprietor of S.G.M. Lorry Service. He filed an application in IBA/144/2019 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for recovery of Rs.1,40,02,583/- from M/s.Thiru Arooran Sugars Private Limited and Rs.67,87,962/- from M/s.Shree Ambika Sugars Limited. The said Application was withdrawn by the complainant pursuant to the Memorandum of Compromise arrived at between the complainant and M/s.Thiru Arooran Sugars Private Limited and M/s.Shree Ambika Sugars Limited, and the accused issued the following cheques.
| Date | Amount (Rs.) | In favour of |
| 30.04.2019 | 46,67,000-00 | Thiru Arooran Sugars Private Limited |
| 31.05.2019 | 46,67,000-00 | -do- |
| 30.06.2019 | 46,68,583-00 | -do- |
| 30.04.2019 | 22,62,600-00 | Shree Ambika Sugars Limited |
| 31.05.2023 | 22,62,600-00 | -do- |
| 30.06.2019 | 22,62,762-00 | -do- |
When the cheques were presented by the complainant through his banker, viz., Lakshmi Vilas Bank, Cuddalore, the same were returned unpaid for the reason 'Insufficient Funds'. Therefore, the complainant issued statutory notices dated 09.05.2019, 18.06.2019 and 16.07.2019 to the Chairman and Managing Director of M/s.Thiru Arooran Sugars Private Limited, and M/s.Shree Ambika Sugars Limited demanding them to make good the payment. Since no reply was received from any of them, he filed the following cases under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the accused before the Judicial Magistrate III, Cuddalore.
| Case No. | Cheque No. | Cheque Date | Amount claimed to be in default (Rs.) |
| STC/823/2019 | 520719 | 30.04.2019 | 22,62,600-00 |
| STC/824/2019 | 520606 | 30.04.2019 | 46,67,000-00 |
| STC/1095/2019 | 520607 | 31.05.2019 | 46,67,000-00 |
| STC/1096/2019 | 520720 | 31.05.2019 | 22,62,600-00 |
| STC/1097/2019 | 520610 | 30.06.2019 | 46,68,583-00 |
| STC/1098/2019 | 520721 | 30.06.2019 | 22,62,762-00 |
4.2. On receipt of the complaints, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore, took cognizance of the offence after recording the sworn statement of the complainant and issued summons to the accused under Section 204 Cr.P.C. On appearance of the accused, copies of records were furnished to him under Section 207 Cr.P.C and the accused was also questioned with regard to the substance of accusation made against him. Since the accused pleaded not guilty, the case was posted for trial. The complainant examined himself and marked various documents. The accused thereafter was questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C,.with regard to the circumstances appearing in evidence against him. His answers were of simple denial. At this stage, the complainant filed petitions to implead the principal offender, namely, M/s.Thiru Arooran Sugars Private Limited and M/s.Shree Ambika Sugars Limited as accused in the respec
Vicarious liability of the accused for the actions of the company and the implications of technical defects in the complaint on the prosecution and trial.
The sufficiency of a legal notice under the N.I. Act does not require specific formulations, and a managing partner can send notice on behalf of the firm.
The essential requirements for a valid complaint under Section 138 NI Act, including the demand notice to the drawer of the cheque and the arraignment of the company as the accused when the cheque is....
The issuance of a cheque establishes liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, requiring the accused to rebut the presumption of its validity, which he failed to do.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of impleading the company as an accused for maintaining the prosecution under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881.
A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, can be amended to include the name of the company as an accused, even if the company was not originally named as an accused in t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.