SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3141

R. HEMALATHA
D. Muthulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
P. Jagadambal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:For the Petitioner:S. Vasanthi, Advocate. For the Respondent:D.R. Arunkumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records relating to the judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in Crl.A.No.27/2019 dated 17.03.2021 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment dated 30.01.2019 in C.C.No.136/2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruppur.)

1. Challenge in this revision is made to the judgement and orders passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in C.A.No.27/2019 confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet in C.C.No.136/2010.

2. The case of the complainant in a nutshell is as follows : The revision petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- from the complainant on 05.11.2009 for her urgent family needs. She assured that she would repay the same within a month. In order to discharge the liability, the present revision petitioner/accused issued a cheque bearing No.693482 dated 09.12.2009 (Ex.P1) drawn on City Union Bank, Udumalpet Branch for a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top