IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
K.N. Radhakrishnan & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Deputy Director, Department of Industrial Safety and Health, Hosur - Respondent
Crl.O.P.Nos. 22824 & 22825 of 2023 & Crl.M.P.Nos. 15974, 15975, 15977 & 15979 of 2023
Decided On : 30-10-2023
Factories Act - Criminal Prosecution - Section 7A(1)(2), Section 41 r/w Rule 61 E, 61 F, 61-0 of Factories Act and T.N. Factories Rules - The court discussed the violations and omissions of safety measures mandated in the Factories Act and Rules, and the non-application of mind by the sanctioning authority in granting prosecution. The judgment highlighted the importance of timely and reasoned responses to show cause notices and the implications of delayed replies in criminal prosecutions.
Fact of the Case:
Two accidents occurred in the TVS Motor Company Ltd's factory premises, leading to injuries to workers. The Department of Industrial Safety and Health initiated criminal prosecution against the Manager and Occupier for violations of safety measures under the Factories Act and Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the delayed response to the show cause notice and the lack of sufficient cause for the delay vitiated the prosecution. It emphasized the importance of timely and reasoned responses in criminal proceedings.
Issues: The issues revolved around the timeliness and sufficiency of the responses to the show cause notice, the application of mind by the sanctioning authority, and the implications of delayed replies in criminal prosecutions under the Factories Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delayed response without sufficient cause did not warrant quashing of the prosecution. It emphasized the importance of timely and reasoned responses in criminal proceedings under the Factories Act.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petitions were dismissed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.462 of 2023, pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri, and quash the same. Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.461 of 2023, pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri, and quash the same.)
COMMON ORDER
1. These two criminal original petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C are filed by the Occupier and the Manager of TVS Motor Company Ltd, Hosur, Tamil Nadu to quash the criminal prosecution launched against them by the Deputy Director, Department of Industrial Safety and Health for violation of the provisions under the Factories Act and Rules framed thereunder.
2. In the Manufacturing plant of Two wheelers and Three wheelers of TVS, Hosur, two accident occurred within a span of 15 days. First on 22/05/2023 at about 8.00 a.m, a worker by name Balachander in plant-I of TVS Motor Company Ltd, (KNG 00090) engaged in shifting material through material Lift from the ground floor to 1 st floor. While doing the material movement, the double door material Lift after moving 2 feet upward stopped abruptly. At that time, another worker by name Vijay Kumar, aged 21 came and inspecting the lift found the welding of the strips holding the doors given way due to damage. Through the gap between the two doors, he inserted his bare hand and attempted to fix the damaged latch. Suddenly, the lift doors closed and the lift started moving upward. The right hand of Vijay Kumar caught between two doors and he sustained wrist fracture. The cause for the accident was due to the failure of the occupier/Manger to provide safety gears to the workers while engaging them in hazardous activity and omission to provide adequate training in industrial safety.
3. The next accident occurred on 08/06/2023 in the first shift of the day in plant - II, a trainee worker by name Mahesh aged 22 was engaged in mezzanine floor to unload plastic parts from the material trolley. After unloading at about 10:45 a.m when he was moving the empty trolley towards the lift, he tried to pull the chain of the trolley on the right side without wearing hand gloves. When the trolley moved with heavy force, Mahesh tried to stop the trolley with his bare hands . In the said attempt, his left hand ring finger caught in between the trolley wall and the handle chain. When tried to retrieve his finger, his left hand ring finger to edge got crushed. The trolley was not fixed with push and pull handle bar. The said employee was not provided with adequate training regarding safety measures and was not provided with hand gloves.
4. Both these accidents were intimated to the Department by the Management in Form-18. The Deputy Director of Department of Industrial Safety and Health caused inspection of the industries on 16/06/2023. She found various violations and omissions of safety measures, which are mandated in Factories Act and Rules and the same was caused for these two accidents. Hence, show cause notices dated 23/06/2023 was issued by registered post to the petitioners being the Occupier and Manager of the factory. On 04/07/2023 further proceedings was issued by Joint Director intimating that no reply for the show cause notice received and the defects mentioned in the show cause notice not rectified. Therefore, the department is going to proceed further against them. Thereafter the Joint Director, Industrial Safety and Health, submitted an proposal to the Additional Director, Industrial Safety and health, Salem for initiating criminal action against the petitioners under Section 7 A(1)(2) and Section 41 of Factories Act 1948 r/w Rule 61 E and 61 F of the Tamilnadu Factories Rules 1950. On receiving the sanction order dated 11/08/2023 to prosecute, the complaint laid before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri on 14/08/2023 and the same was t
The importance of timely and reasoned responses to show cause notices and the implications of delayed replies in criminal prosecutions under the Factories Act.
The complaints were an abuse of process of court, as there was no violation of law and rules and regulations, and the complaints were filed belatedly. The non-mention of the show cause notice and its....
It is well settled that at stage of issuing process, Magistrate is mainly concerned with allegations made in complaint or evidence led in support of same and Magistrate is only to be satisfied that t....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to safety regulations in factories, clarifying the applicability of the Factories Act even with fewer than ten workers, and addressing procedural errors....
Point of law : If an order is not obligatory to be passed under the statute, no appeal would lie against the offence alleged under Section 7A(2)(c) of the Factories Act as is alleged in the case at h....
Directors are not liable for offences under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948, and related sections and rules.
Prosecution of Central Government employees in factories requires prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.