Gold Bangles
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
V. Venkatesan - Appellant
Versus
State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI/SPE/ACB, Chennai & Anr. - Respondents
Crl.R.C. No. 1620 of 2023
Decided On : 27-09-2023
Criminal Revision Case - Return of Property - Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C - Summary Disposal of Property - [120B of IPC r/w Sections 7,12,13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988] - [Sections 451, 457 of Cr.P.C] - The court discussed the conditions imposed for defreezing the locker and the legal provisions under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. The court found that the jewels were not required for the trial and were not in the custody of the court, thus setting aside the conditions imposed and directing the defreezing of the locker.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, the first accused in a corruption case, sought the return of jewels found in a locker, which were not connected to the case. The trial court allowed the return of the jewels with conditions, which was challenged in the Revision Case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the jewels were not required for the trial and were not in the custody of the court, thus setting aside the conditions imposed and directing the defreezing of the locker.
Issues: The issues revolved around the return of the jewels found in the locker, the conditions imposed for defreezing, and the legal provisions under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that when the property is not required for the trial and not in the custody of the court, there is no necessity to impose conditions for its return, and the custody of the property can be returned to the owner even without conditions.
Final Decision: The court set aside the conditions imposed for defreezing the locker and directed the defreezing of the locker, allowing the petitioner to operate the locker and remove the jewels found inside.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the conditions imposed in Crl.M.P.No.4959 of 2023 in C.C.No.17 of 2015 dated 16.06.2023 against the petitioner pending on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.)
1. The petitioner herein is the first accused in C.C.No.17 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. On completion of investigation, CBI has filed Final Report for prosecuting this petitioner and one Rabindrakumar Bhalotia. After taking the statement one N.Babu (approver), the Final Report indicates that tender was floated for purchasing brake equipments for Southern Railway and in the course of purchase order and payment, it is alleged that the petitioner herein has accepted bribe of Rs.30,000/- from the supplier (A2) and that money was deposited in the account of approver as per the direction of A1. In the course of investigation, the house of the petitioner was searched. Several incriminating materials were collected including key No.80 of locker No.14 in Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Stuartpet Branch, Arakonam. On permission of the Court, inventory for the materials kept in the locker was taken by the Investigating Officer and thereafter, the bank authorities was requested to freeze the operation of locker No.14 in the name of the petitioner herein. In the locker, the following eight items of gold ornaments were found along with one fixed deposit receipt No.5430.
| 1 | Gold Bangles | 2 Nos.23.660 grams |
| 2 | Gold stoned bangles | 2 Nos. 23.300 grams |
| 3 | One Gold Bracelet | 19.300 grams |
| 4 | One Gold Stone Dollar Chain | 42.600 grams |
| 5 | One Gold becklace | 17.600 grams |
| 6 | One pair stone gold | 8.500 grams |
| 7 | Four Pairs gold stoned kammal with jimiki | 28.100 grams |
| 8 | Four pairs gold kammal | 13.000 grams |
| Total | 176.060 grams |
2. In the Final Report, there is no whisper about the jewels or FDR found in the locker, which has now been freezed on the direction of the Investigating Officer.
3. The petitioner had taken out the application under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C for return of the custody of the jewels kept in the locker, after defreezing the locker. The request has emanated from the petitioner on the eve of his daughter's marriage. The trial Court, after considering the application of the petitioner and the counter filed by the CBI and after recording the disclaim in the additional counter filed by the respondent, held that except RC 26(A)/2014 in C.C.No.17 of 2015, which is for the offence under Section 120B of IPC r/w Sections 7,12,13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, there is no other case pending investigation against the petitioner and the jewels found in the locker No.14, which stands in the name of the petitioner herein in the Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Arakonam, is no way connected with the prosecution case in C.C.No.17 of 2015. After observing so, the trial Court allowed the petition permitting defreezing of the locker on the following conditions:-
(1) The 1st respondent is hereby directed to take necessary steps to defreeze the locker No.14 stands in the name of the petitioner herein at Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., Arakonam, in connection with SB A/c.No.1639 to enable the petitioner to operate the same on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond worth Rs.8,00,000/- (eight lakhs only) by petitioner himself or through other surety.
(2) The petitioner shall not alienate or sold over or sell the petition mentioned jewels till the disposal of the case.
(3) The petitioner shall produce the petition mentioned jewels as and when required by the Court.
4. This order dated 16.06.2023 is n
An asset freezing order requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and lack of adequate justification renders the order unsustainable.
The central legal point established is the interpretation and application of Sections 451 and 452 of Cr.P.C. in balancing the interests of property owners and the prosecution during trial.
Seizure of bank accounts and bank locker under Section 102 Cr.P.C is lawful if they have direct links with the alleged offence, and the transfer of seized property from one case to another can be jus....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court can quash criminal proceedings if the material relied upon by the accused rules out the assertions contained in the charges, and if ....
Interim custody of seized property under S. 503 BNSS should be granted expeditiously when there is no rival claim, using bonds and photographic records to secure evidentiary value rather than keeping....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.