Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
Mareeswaran & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai - Respondent
Crl.A.(MD). Nos. 492 & 500 of 2022 & 347 & 577 of 2023 & Crl.M.P(MD). Nos. 9389 of 2022 & 6730 of 2023
Decided On : 03-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellants were charged with trafficking a significant quantity of narcotics. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court provided a detailed account of the legal proceedings and previous convictions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by the defense questioned the procedural integrity of the case. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the evidence presented by the prosecution was considered reliable and credible. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. judgment emphasized that compliance with ndps act provisions was observed. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. conclusions drawn by court supported by substantial and credible evidence. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. questions regarding procedural lapses did not undermine prosecution's case. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. court upheld sentence on previous culpable involvement of defendants. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 9. final decision dismissed appeals based on lack of merit. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 10. reiterated that all critical points raised were sufficiently addressed. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayers: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to call for the records relating to the judgment dated 22.07.2022 in C.C.No.267 of 2020 on the file of the learned II-Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Madurai and set aside the same.)
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to call for the records relating to the judgment dated 22.07.2022 in C.C.No.267 of 2020 on the file of the Learned IIAdditional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Madurai and set aside the same.
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to call for the records relating to the judgment and conviction dated 22.07.2022 in C.C.No.267 of 2020 on the file of the Learned II-Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Madurai and set aside the same.
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to call for the records relating to the judgment and conviction dated 22.07.2022 in C.C.No.267 of 2020 on the file of the Learned II-Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Madurai and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants.)
Common Judgment:
Since these criminal appeals are arising out of the same crime, these appeals are taken up for hearing together and disposed of by way of common judgment.
1. The appellants are said to have committed the offence under Sections 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act') for the alleged possession of 25 kg of Ganja. The II Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai convicted the appellants in Spl.C.C.No.267 of 2020 under Section 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act by its judgment dated 22.07.2022 and sentenced them to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each, in default to undergo 1 year Simple Imprisonment each for the offence under Sections 8 (c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act. Challenging the same, the appellants filed these criminal appeals.
Crl.A. (MD)No.
C.C.No.
Rank of the accused
Conviction under Section
Sentence
Fine amount with default sentence
499 of 2022
267 of 2020
Accused No-3
8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act
10years Rigorous Imprisonment
Rs.1,00,000/- each, in default to undergo 1 year Simple Imprisonment
347 of 2023
267 of 2020
Accused No-1
8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act
10years Rigorous Imprisonment
Rs1,00,000/- each, in default to undergo 1 year Simple Imprisonment
500 of 2022
267 of 2020
Accused No-6
8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act
10years Rigorous Imprisonment
Rs1,00,000/- each, in default to undergo 1 year Simple Imprisonment
577 of 2023
267 of 2020
Accused Nos-4 & 5
8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act
10years Rigorous Imprisonment
Rs1,00,000/- each, in default to undergo 1 year Simple Imprisonment
Brief facts necessary for disposal of this appeal, are as follows:
2. According to the prosecution, the appellants have conspired together to procure Ganja from Tenkasi District and transport
The court affirmed that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is essential, yet lapses may not void convictions if substantial evidence supports the prosecution's case.
The court affirmed that possession of 201 kilograms of ganja established under the NDPS Act sufficed for conviction, confirming that procedural safeguards were adhered to despite the absence of indep....
Strict compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act is essential for admissibility of evidence; minor discrepancies do not invalidate a conviction when substantial compliance is demonst....
The prosecution established the appellant's conscious possession of narcotics, validating the conviction despite procedural non-compliance, as substantial evidence supported the case.
Possession of narcotics requires no personal search compliance under Section 50 when found during public checks; evidence established conscious possession leads to conviction under the NDPS Act.
The prosecution's failure to prove presence and possession of contraband due to inconsistencies and non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the NDPS Act led to acquittal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
