Back
K. K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Mareeswaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellants were charged with trafficking a significant quantity of narcotics. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court provided a detailed account of the legal proceedings and previous convictions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by the defense questioned the procedural integrity of the case. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the evidence presented by the prosecution was considered reliable and credible. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. judgment emphasized that compliance with ndps act provisions was observed. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. conclusions drawn by court supported by substantial and credible evidence. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. questions regarding procedural lapses did not undermine prosecution's case. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. court upheld sentence on previous culpable involvement of defendants. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 9. final decision dismissed appeals based on lack of merit. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 10. reiterated that all critical points raised were sufficiently addressed. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayers: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to call for the records relating to the judgment dated 22.07.2022 in C.C.No.267 of 2020 on the file of the learned II-Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act cases, Mad
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
