SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3291

S. NAGAMUTHU
V. Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Jain – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Selvakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:J. Sudhakaran, Advocates

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Consitution of India, to set aside the fair order and decretal Order dated 21.1.2013 in I.A. No.2177 of 2012 in O.S. No.332 of 2010 on the title of the learned Additional District Munsif, Alandur.)

1. The petitioner is the Plaintiff in O.S. No.332 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Alandur. The Respondents are the Defendants in the said Suit. The Petitioner has filed the said Suit for Permanent Injunction, to restrain the Defendants from in any manner interfering with his alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Suit Property. But, the defendants in their Written Statement have stated that a part of the Suit Property was being used as a pathway by the Defendants to go over to their land. The Defendants, therefore, filed Interlocutory Application in I.A. No.59 of 2012, for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to make local inspection of the Suit property and to submit Report. The Commissioner visited the Suit property and a submitted a Report. The Petitioner/ Plaintiff has filed an objection to the said Property.

2. Thereafter, the Petitioner has filed an Interlocutory Applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top