2024 Supreme(Mad) 264
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J.
R. David @ Tamilvanan - Appellant
Vs.
G. Premalatha & Another - Respondent
Crl.R.C. No. 84 of 2024 & Crl.M.P. No. 683 of 2024
Decided On : 01-03-2024
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.L. Venkatesan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K. Shankar, Advocate.
IMPORTANT POINT
The court prioritized the best interests of the child and the need for expeditious disposal of maintenance cases, considering the petitioner's medical emergency and financial difficulties.
Headnote:
Criminal Revision Petition - Maintenance Case - Christian Marriage Act - Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. - I.D.O.P.No.42 of 2014 - M.C.No.526 of 2019 - M.P.No.685 of 2021 - M.P.No.380 of 2022 - Expeditious Disposal of Maintenance Case
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a criminal revision petition to set aside an order in a maintenance case. The petitioner and the 1st respondent were married under the Christian Marriage Act. The 1st respondent sought maintenance for the 2nd respondent, their child, and the Family Court awarded maintenance against the petitioner. The petitioner sought to set aside the exparte order and subsequent conditional order due to various reasons, including a medical emergency and financial difficulties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's delay in complying with the conditional order was condoned due to the petitioner's accident and medical treatment. The court set aside the exparte order and directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance to the respondents until the final order is passed in the maintenance case. The court also directed expeditious disposal of the maintenance case.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's compliance with the maintenance order, the validity of the exparte and conditional orders, and the petitioner's financial and medical circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's medical emergency, financial difficulties, and the best interests of the child in setting aside the exparte order and directing interim maintenance payments. The court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the maintenance case.
Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Case was allowed, the exparte order in the maintenance case was set aside, and the court directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance. The court also instructed expeditious disposal of the maintenance case.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 28.08.2022 in M.P.No.685/2021 in M.C.No.526/2019 on the file of learned III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai.)
1. The petitioner filed this criminal revision case to set aside the order, dated 28.08.2022 in M.C.No.685 of 2021 in M.C.No.526 of 2019 passed by the learned III Additional Principal Judge, III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai.
2. The case is that on 12.05.2011, the petitioner between the petitioner and the 1st respondent was solemnized as per Christian Marriage Act. Thereafter, they were living as husband and wife in the petitioner’s house. The 1st respondent was unable to withstand the ill-treatment given by the petitioner’s mother. Despite the same, the 1st respondent tolerated to protect the matrimonial life. The 1st respondent got conceived and she went to her parental home for delivery of the child, the 2nd respondent viz., Baby Tamil Smitha was born to them on 29.01.2012. The petitioner informed that he would find a new home and would take the respondents, since it was not possible for the respondents to live in a cordial atmosphere with the petitioner's mother. The petitioner filed divorce petition in I.D.O.P.No.42 of 2014 before the learned Principal District Judge, Thiruvallur on the ground of cruelty. The 1st respondent denied the allegations and also sought for reunion. During the month of July 2016, the petitioner informed the 1st respondent that he would withdraw the divorce case and take back the respondents along with him immediately after identifying a separate home. In the meanwhile, the petitioner was visiting the respondents occasionally and later, the petitioner failed to visit them and take care of them. The respondents went to the petitioner’s house where they were prevented by the petitioner’s mother informing that there is no relationship between them as husband and wife and an exparte order in I.D.O.P.No.42 of 2014 was decreed on 29.01.2016.
3. The 2nd respondent is now studying in M/s.Jessy Moses School, Anna Nagar and the 1st respondent had to meet out the fee around one lakh apart from uniform, books and transport charges and others expenses. The 1st respondent having no source to support the 2nd respondent, filed a maintenance petition in M.C.No.526 of 2019. The petitioner is employed in Southern Railway as Senior AC Technician having monthly income of Rs.55,000/- to Rs.60,000/-. In the said maintenance case, the petitioner was set exparte on 03.02.2020. The Family Court awarded the decree against the petitioner directing to pay maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month from 30.08.2019. Thereafter, the respondents filed a petition seeking attachment of the petitioner’s salary in M.P.No.380 of 2022. On 14.10.2022, the attachment was ordered. In the meanwhile, the petitioner filed M.P.No.685 of 2021 under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C., to set aside the exparte order in M.C.No.526 of 2019, dated 30.02.2022. The Family Court passed conditional order on 23.12.2021 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- on or before 27.01.2022. But this conditional order was not complied with. Instead the petitioner filed a petition to set aside the conditional order. Since the conditional order was not complied, the request of the petitioner was rejected by order, dated 28.08.2022, against which, the petitioner filed the above Criminal Revision Case.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Family Court not considered the COVID-19 period and the delay in complying with the order. Added to it, the petitioner met with an accident on 06.12.2021 and took treatment at Government Hospital, Poonamallee and thereafter for further treatment at MIOT International Hospital as inpatient. To substantiate the same, the petitioner produced the copy of the FIR in Crime No.967 of 2021 and the medical records of MIOT International Hospital to show th