SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 520

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.
N.V. Nagarajan – Petitioner
Versus
State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption – Petitioner
Criminal Appeal No.708 of 2018
Decided On : 19-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C.R. Malarvannan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

Headnote:

Criminal Appeal - Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) - The court analyzed the evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery by the prosecution witnesses and found the accused guilty. The court also considered the non-observance of the rules under the DVAC Manual and the rebuttal of the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court were confirmed.

Fact of the Case:

The accused, a Record Clerk at a government hospital, demanded Rs.1000 for issuing four wound certificates, which was Rs.800 over the fixed fee. A trap was organized, and the accused was apprehended after accepting the money. The accused denied the charges but failed to rebut the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty based on the clear and cogent evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery by the prosecution witnesses. The court also considered the non-observance of the rules under the DVAC Manual and the failure of the accused to rebut the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Issues: The issues considered by the court were whether the prosecution proved the case of demand, acceptance, and recovery, whether the accused rebutted the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and whether the trial court properly analyzed the evidence in arriving at the guilt of the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution had proved the foundational facts of demand, acceptance, and recovery beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption required under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court also found no infirmity in the judgment of the trial court.

Final Decision: The court confirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court, directing the accused to undergo the remaining period of sentence and pay the fine amount if not already paid.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on him by the Hon'ble Special Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri in Special Calender Case No.2 of 2012, dated 31.10.2018 and to set aside the conviction and sentence.)

1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on the accused by the Special Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri in Special Calender Case No.2 of 2012, dated 31.10.2018.

2. The case of the prosecution is as follows :-

The accused was working as a Record Clerk at Government Head Quarters Hospital, Krishnagiri. The defacto complainant is a resident of Bangalore. He, along with PW-4 [Mr.Fiyaz], PW-5 [Mr.Sheik Mohideen] and PW-6 [Mr.Thanigaivel], were travelling in a Maruti Van on 23.12.2010. They were returning from Chennai to their respective place of residence. While the van was nearing Anginayanapalli Village, it met with an accident and got capsized. All the four persons got injured. On 31.12.2010, PW-2[Mr.Nisar Ahmed] applied for a copy of his wound certificate in order to claim insurance. The said application is Ex.P2. PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] was asked to come on 03.01.2011 by the hospital authorities. However, he was not able to go to the hospital on 03.01.2011. On 05.01.2011, PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] went to the hospital and met the accused, who demanded Rs.250/- for each wound certificate i.e. totally Rs.1000/- for four wound certificates. PW 2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] had no money and hence, he returned. On 06.01.2011 at 11.00 a.m., PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] again met the accused and at that time, the accused alleged to have reiterated his demand and said that he would be able to get the certificate only if the money demanded by him was given.

3. On the same day at 06.00 p.m., PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] went to the Vigilance Office at Krishnagiri and gave a complaint, which is Ex.P3. On 07.01.2011 at 08.00 a.m, an FIR was registered in Crime No.1/AC/2011/KG against the accused, which is Ex.P4. A trap was organized by PW-23 [Mr.Sathish], Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption pursuant for which he summoned PW-3 [Mr.Saravanan] and PW-15 [Mr.Stalin], the Government Servants to participate in the trap proceedings. PW-23 [Mr.Sathish], after completing the preliminary formalities for trap proceedings had reduced the happenings in an Entrustment mahazar, which is Ex.P5.

4. The trap party reached the Krishnagiri Government Hospital at 10.15 a.m., PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] and PW-3 [Mr.Saravanan] went to the hospital and met the accused. The accused went inside, brought a file and had taken PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] and PW-3 [Mr.Saravanan] to the Doctor, but, the Doctor was not there and hence, they came back to the room of the accused. At that time, the accused in the presence of PW-3 [Mr.Saravanan] asked PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] whether he had brought money as instructed by him. PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] said in the affirmative, took the money and handed the over the same to the accused. The accused received money and counted it with both hands. Thereafter, he put the money in his right side pant pocket. The accused asked PW-2 [Mr.Nisar Ahmed] to come on the next day. PW-2[Mr.Nisar Ahmed] came out and signalled the trap team. The trap team went into the hospital and asked PW-2 to wait outside. Thereafter, the accused was tested with sodium carbonate solution. Both his hands turned pink. A recovery mahazar was prepared which is Ex.P14.

5. PW-23[Mr.Sathish] asked the accused about the money for which, the accused took it out and handed over the same to PW- 23[Mr.Sathish]. PW-15 [Mr.Stalin] was asked to verify the serial numbers of the currency notes mentioned in the Entrustment Mahazar Ex.P 5 with the recovered notes. The serial numbers tallied. The appellant/accused pleaded that out of ignorance he had received the money. The accused was arres

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top