Back
A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
L. Sagayaraj – Appellant
Versus
State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction challenged under prevention of corruption act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellant regarding trial court errors. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and reliability of witnesses. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. established burden of proof on prosecution under prevention of corruption act. (Para 39 , 41) |
| 5. accused acquitted based on lack of evidence. (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT :
A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.
(Prayer : Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., read with Section 2 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, against the judgment of conviction made in C.C.No.145 of 2011(Old C.C.No.03/2011) dated 09.02.2017 on the file of Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Chennai.)
The present Criminal Appeal has been filed by the sole accused in C.C.No.145 of 2011, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.02.2017 rendered by the Special Judge for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Chennai.
2. The appellant/accused stands convicted by the Trial Court for the offences under Sections 7 , 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and impose
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
